Skip to main content

Table 3 ESD procedure outcomes (trainee endoscopist): multi-loop traction device-assisted ESD versus conventional ESD (n = 12) in the ex vivo pilot study

From: Multi-loop traction device facilitates gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: ex vivo pilot study and an inaugural clinical experience

 

M-ESD (n = 6)

C-ESD (n = 6)

p value

Rate of en bloc resection (%)

100 (6/6)

100 (6/6)

Rate of R0 resection (%)

100 (6/6)

100 (6/6)

Rate of accidental complications (perforation) during ESD (%)

0 (0–6)

0 (0–6)

Overall procedure time (min); median (IQR)

43.0 (35.5–62.5)

50.5 (43.3–54)

1.00

Local injection time (min); median (IQR)

5 (4.3–8)

8.5 (7.3–9)

0.52

Perimeter incision time (min); median (IQR)

17 (12.3–19.5)

7.0 (5.3–13.3)

0.13

MLTD attachment time (min); median (IQR)

3.0 (2.3–3)

Submucosal dissection time (min); median (IQR)

12.5 (9.3–21)

28.0 (25.3–31.5)

0.08

MLTD extraction time (min); median (IQR)

1.0 (1–1.75)

Total local injection volume (mL); median (IQR)

31.0 (21.8–38.8)

36.5 (24–47.5)

0.57

Specimen area (mm2); median (IQR)

854.1 (714.4–1158.1)

637.8 (598.6–880.8)

0.23

Number of additional local injections; median (IQR)

0 (0–0.75)

0 (0–0.75)

0.92

  1. ESD, Endoscopic submucosal dissection; MLTD, multi-loop traction device; IQR, interquartile range; C-ESD, conventional ESD; M-ESD, Multi-loop traction device-assisted ESD