Skip to main content

Table 2 Procedural details and tumor responses of the HCC patients treated by cTACE with CBCT assistance (CBCT-cTACE) and patients treated by cTACE with DSA alone (DSA-cTACE)

From: Impact of cone-beam computed tomography with automated feeder detection software on the survival outcome of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma during treatment with conventional transarterial chemoembolization

 

CBCT-cTACE

(n = 196)

DSA-cTACE

(n = 141)

p value

Lipiodol, ml, mean (range)

7.5 ± 3.4 (2‒16)

7.8 ± 3.3 (2‒16)

0.068

Doxorubicin dose, mg, mean (range)

21.6 ± 10.6 (5‒50)

33.6 ± 17.1 (5‒50)

 < 0.001*

Number of treated hepatic segments

 1

107 (54)

76 (54)

0.150

 2

68 (35)

59 (42)

 

 3

16 (8)

5 (3)

 

 4

5 (3)

1 (1)

 

Number of cine acquisitions, mean (range)

4.6 (1‒14)

5.1 (2‒17)

0.017*

Number of CBCT acquisitions, mean (range)

3.4 (1‒11)

  

Fluoroscopic time, mins, mean (range)

16.3 (4.1‒60.4)

12.4 (3.3‒54.4)

 < 0.001*

Post embolization syndrome (%)

 Yes

19 (10)

15 (11)

0.920

 No

177 (90)

126 (89)

 

Tumor responsea

 CR

131 (67)

31 (22)

 < 0.001*

 PR

55 (28)

67 (48)

 

 SD

7 (4)

13 (9)

 

 PD

3 (1)

30 (21)

 

Additional cTACE, times, mean (range)

2.7 (1‒10)

3.0 (1‒14)

0.400

  1. Data are presented as number (%) unless otherwise indicated
  2. CBCT-cTACE cone-beam computed tomography assisted conventional transarterial chemoembolization, DSA-cTACE digital subtraction angiography assisted conventional transarterial chemoembolization, CR complete response, PR partial response, SD stable disease, PD progressive disease
  3. aTumor response defined by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria (mRECIST)  
  4. *Likelihood ratio test