Skip to main content

Table 3 Evaluations for the potential publication bias within the meta-analysis

From: Clinicopathological significance of HSP70 expression in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Groups of outcomes

Reference count

Estimates

Begg’s test (p value)

Egger’s test (p value)

Publication bias

Age (≤ 60 years vs > 60)

2

OR with 95% CI

1.000

Not reported

Not significant

Gender (male vs female)

8

OR with 95% CI

0.536

0.786

Not significant

Depth of invasion (T3/T4 vs T1/T2)

7

OR with 95% CI

0.368

0.304

Not significant

Differentiation degrees (low vs high)

5

OR with 95% CI

1.000

0.745

Not significant

H.pylori infection (positive vs negative)

2

OR with 95% CI

1.000

Not reported

Not significant

Histological subtypes (intestinal vs diffuse)

4

OR with 95% CI

1.000

0.493

Not significant

Lymph node invasion (positive vs negative)

9

OR with 95% CI

0.466

0.101

Not significant

TNM stages (I/II vs III/IV)

6

OR with 95% CI

1.000

0.653

Not significant

Lymphovascular invasion (positive vs negative)

5

OR with 95% CI

0.221

0.180

Not significant

Metastasis (positive vs negative)

5

OR with 95% CI

0.221

0.295

Not significant

Prognostic significance

6

HR with 95% CI

1.000

0.781

Not significant

  1. OR odds ratio; HR hazard ratio; CI confidence interval