Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of pooled results regarding serum variables about hepatic fibrosis

From: The clinical efficacy and adverse effects of Entecavir plus Thymosin alpha-1 combination therapy versus Entecavir Monotherapy in HBV-related cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Variable

Studies included (n)

Patients included (n)

SMD

95%CI

Significance, P

Heterogeneity

P

I2

HA

 After treatment, EG vs. CG

1

114

−2.38

−2.87, −1.89

<  0.00001

NA

NA

PC-III

 After treatment, EG vs. CG

1

114

−2.92

−4.42, −1.43

<  0.00001

NA

NA

LN

 After treatment, EG vs. CG

1

114

−1.99

−4.50, 0.52

0.06

NA

NA

C-IV

vAfter treatment, EG vs. CG

1

114

−2.60

−3.86, −1.33

< 0.0001

NA

NA

  1. CG control group, the group with ETV monotherapy, EG experimental group, the group with ETV plus Tα1 combination therapy, SMD standardized mean difference, CI confidence interval, HA hyaluronic acid, PC-III precollagen III, LN laminin, C-IV type IV collagen, NA not applicable