Skip to main content

Table 6 Factors associated with incomplete resection after propensity score matching

From: The outcomes of modified endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors and the value of endoscopic morphology classification in endoscopic resection

 

Complete resection (n = 142)

incomplete resection (n = 12)

P value

Patient-related variables

 Age, y (mean ± SD)

50.7 ± 11.0

47.6 ± 8.4

0.257

 Sex, male/female

81/61

9/3

0.364

Lesion-related variables

 Lesion size, mm (mean ± SD)

6.1 ± 2.2

6.5 ± 1.6

0.318

 Lesion size group, n (%)

  < 10 mm

124(87.3%)

12 (100%)

0.398

  ≥ 10 mm

18(12.7%)

0(0.0%)

 

 Location, (U / Middle / L)

9/79/54

2/6/4

0.410

 Histopathological grade(G1/G2)

128/14

8/4

0.050

 Invasion layer, (M/SM)

29/113

1/11

0.525

 Endoscopic morphology, n (%)

  

0.022*

  Ia

10(7.1%)

0(0.0%)

 

  Ib

104(73.2%)

6(50.0%)

 

  II

26(18.3%)

4(33.3%)

 

  III

2(1.4%)

2(16.7%)

 

Outcomes variables

 Procedure type, n (%)

  

0.548

  m-EMR

70(49.3%)

7(58.3%)

 

  ESD

72(50.7%)

5(41.7%)

 

 En bloc resection, n (%)

141(99.3%)

12(100%)

0.922

  1. ESD Endoscopic submucosal dissection, m-EMR Modified endoscopic mucosal resection, SD standard deviation, U upper third of rectum, L lower third of rectum, M mucosal, SM submucosal
  2. *p < 0.05