Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of the renal function index between US data and Chinese data

From: Association between NAFLD and risk of prevalent chronic kidney disease: why there is a difference between east and west?

 

US data (n = 11,844)

Chinese data (n = 51,229)

P value

(NHANES vs. Chinese)

Total (n = 11,844)

non-NAFLD Group (n = 7571)

NAFLD Group (n = 4273)

P value

Total (n = 51,229)

non-NAFLD Group (n = 37,334)

NAFLD Group (n = 13,895)

P value

Serum creatinine (umol/l)

93.52 ± 29.19

93.62 ± 30.90

93.35 ± 25.88

0.636

82.92 ± 20.82

80.92 ± 21.70

88.29 ± 17.14

< 0.001

< 0.001

eGFR (ml/min/1.732)

80.15 ± 18.65

81.10 ± 18.51

78.45 ± 18.78

< 0.001

91.48 ± 17.06

93.03 ± 17.31

87.32 ± 15.62

< 0.001

< 0.001

Proteinuria, n(%)

1305(11.0%)

714(9.4%)

591(13.8%)

< 0.001

3231(6.3%)

1977(5.3%)

1254(9.0%)

< 0.001

< 0.001

CKD, n(%)

2544(21.5%)

1441(19.0%)

1103(25.8%)

< 0.001

4685(9.1%)

2971(8.0%)

1714(12.3%)

< 0.001

< 0.001

CKD Categories, n(%)

 G0, n(%)

9300(78.5%)

6130(81.0%)

3170(74.2%)

 

46,544(90.9%)

34,363(92.0%)

12,181(87.7%)

< 0.001

< 0.001

 G1–2, n(%)

958(8.1%)

521(6.9%)

434(10.2%)

 

2659(5.2%)

1616(4.4%)

1043(7.5%)

< 0.001

< 0.001

 G3–5, n(%)

1586(13.5%)

917(12.1%)

669(15.7%)

 

2026(4.0%)

1355(3.6%)

671(4.8%)

< 0.001

< 0.001