Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of pathologic characteristics between laparoscopic stapleless left lateral sectionectomy (LH) and open left lateral sectionectomy (OH) for hepatocellular carcinoma

From: Stapleless laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: reappraisal of the Louisville statement by a young liver surgeon

Variables

LH group a

(n = 18)

OH group

(n = 75)

p value

Tumor size (cm)b

3.2 ± 0.50

4.9 ± 0.41

0.011

Tumor size (> 5 cm (%))

2 (11.1)

26 (34.7)

0.083

Encapsulation (Yes (%))

16 (88.9)

64 (85.3)

1.000

Capsular invasion (Yes (%))

12 (66.7)

45 (60.8)

0.789

Tumor rupture (Yes (%))

0 (0)

13 (17.3)

0.066

Vascular invasion (Yes (%))

5 (27.8)

20 (26.7)

1.000

Daughter nodules (Yes (%))

2 (11.1)

9 (12.0)

1.000

Resection margin (Negative (%))

18 (100)

74 (98.7)

1.000

Safety margin (≥1 cm (%))

11 (61.1)

35 (46.7)

0.304

Edmonson and Steiner grade (III and IV (%))

6 (35.3)

27 (37.0)

1.000

Cirrhosis (Yes (%))

8 (44.4)

44 (58.7)

0.302

T stage

 T1 (%)

11 (61.1)

37 (52.9)

0.631

 T2 (%)

4 (22.2)

15 (21.4)

 

 T3a/T3b (%)

0/4 (0/5.7)

1/2 (1.4/11.1)

 

 T4 (%)

1 (5.6)

13 (18.6)

 
  1. ainclude laparoscopic and robotic left lateral sectionectomy
  2. bmean ± standard error of mean