Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the eligible studies included in the systematic assessment

From: Irinotecan-containing doublet treatment versus irinotecan monotherapy as second-line choice for advanced gastric cancer

Author and Year

Study design

Area

Study arms

Number of patients

mPFS(m)

mOS(m)

ORR(%)

DCR(%)

Higuchi K 2014 [10]

phase III clinical trial

Japan

irinotecan+cisplatin

64

3.8

10.7

22.0

75.0

irinotecan

63

2.8

10.1

16.0

54.0

Nishikawa K 2015 [11]

phase III clinical trial

Japan

irinotecan+cisplatin

82

4.6

13.9

17.0

69.0

irinotecan

81

4.1

12.7

16.0

65.0

Oba M 2011 [17]

retrospective study

Japan

irinotecan+cisplatin

42

2.7

9.8

20.0

54.3

irinotecan

92

2.6

8

8.1

54.1

Satoh T 2015 [12]

phase II clinical trial

Japan and Korea

irinotecan+nimotuzumab

40

2.4

8.3

18.4

47.4

irinotecan

43

2.8

7.7

10.3

46.2

Sym SJ 2013 [13]

phase II clinical trial

Korea

irinotecan+ 5-fluorouracil

30

3

6.7

20.0

56.7

irinotecan

29

2.2

5.8

17.2

48.2

Tanabe K 2015 [14]

phase II/III clinical trial

Japan

irinotecan+S1

145

3.8

8.8

9.0

48.0

irinotecan

148

3.4

9.5

9.0

53.0

Ueda A 2013 [16]

retrospective study

Japan

irinotecan+mitomycin C

22

3.9

9.6

19.0

86.0

irinotecan

24

3.7

8.7

10.0

62.0