Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Evaluation of risk factors for perforated peptic ulcer

Original Submission
21 Jul 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Kazuki Yamamoto
8 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Irene Coati
21 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sajan Jiv Singh Nagpal
2 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Giuseppe Nicolò Fanelli
7 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hyunghun Kim
Resubmission - Version 2
27 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Kazuki Yamamoto
16 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Irene Coati
26 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sajan Jiv Singh Nagpal
19 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Giuseppe Nicolò Fanelli
7 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hyunghun Kim
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Feb 2018 Author responded Author comments - Kazuki Yamamoto
29 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sajan Jiv Singh Nagpal
10 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hyunghun Kim
Resubmission - Version 4
5 Feb 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
6 Feb 2018 Editorially accepted
15 Feb 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12876-018-0756-4

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page