Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Comparison of five tumor regression grading systems for gastric adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective study of 192 cases from National Cancer Center in China

Original Submission
30 Aug 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
10 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chikara Kunisaki
9 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - C Gutschow
12 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Zhou Zhi-wei
22 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Yuelu Zhu
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
13 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Yuelu Zhu
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Yuelu Zhu
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
26 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Yuelu Zhu
Resubmission - Version 5
26 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
1 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Yuelu Zhu
Resubmission - Version 6
1 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
8 Mar 2017 Editorially accepted
14 Mar 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12876-017-0598-5

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page