Skip to main content

Table 2 Reasons for surveillance test preferences using a hypothetical scenario of being at intermediate risk for CRC

From: Using a hypothetical scenario to assess public preferences for colorectal surveillance following screening-detected, intermediate-risk adenomas: annual home-based stool test vs. triennial colonoscopy

 

Preferred a home-based stool testa

Preferred colonoscopy

 

% (n = 298)

[95 % CI]

% (n = 152)

[95 % CI]

Reason for preferenceb

    

More frequent

62.1 (185)

[56.5, 67.4]

21.7 (33)

[15.9, 28.9]

More convenient

51.7 (154)

[46.0, 57.3]

12.5 (19)

[8.2, 18.7]

Less likely to cause side-effects

39.9 (119)

[34.5, 45.6]

7.2 (11)

[4.1, 12.5]

Less likely to harm me

32.6 (97)

[27.5, 38.1]

5.9 (9)

[3.2, 10.9]

Better at finding polyps or cancer

28.9 (86)

[24.0, 34.3]

77.6 (118)

[70.4, 83.5]

More thorough

21.5 (64)

[17.2, 26.5]

53.9 (82)

[46.0, 61.7]

More familiar as I would have had the test before

16.8 (50)

[13.0, 21.4]

29.6 (45)

[22.9, 37.3]

Better at showing what is happening during the test

6.4 (19)

[4.1, 9.8]

17.8 (27)

[12.5, 24.6]

Other reasons

7.0 (21)

[4.5, 10.7]

3.3 (5)

[1.4, 7.5]

  1. aThe home-based stool test was comparable to FIT
  2. bN.B participants could select more than one reason