Peer Review reports
From: Discounting the duration of bolus exposure in impedance testing underestimates acid reflux
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 19 Nov 2015 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 23 Nov 2015 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Fernando Herbella |
| 9 Dec 2015 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Wai-Kit Lo |
| 11 Dec 2015 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marco Allaix |
| 6 Jan 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - VIKNESWARAN NAMASIVAYAM |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 6 Jan 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 6 Jan 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Fernando Herbella |
| 6 Jan 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Wai-Kit Lo |
| 7 Jan 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - VIKNESWARAN NAMASIVAYAM |
| 7 Jan 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marco Allaix |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 7 Jan 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 8 Jan 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Wai-Kit Lo |
| 18 Mar 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - VIKNESWARAN NAMASIVAYAM |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 18 Mar 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 5 May 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - VIKNESWARAN NAMASIVAYAM |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 5 May 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 27 May 2016 | Editorially accepted | |
| 8 Jun 2016 | Article published | 10.1186/s12876-016-0471-y |
You can find further information about peer review here.