Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: An appraisal of clinical practice guidelines for constipation: a right attitude towards to guidelines

Original Submission
10 Aug 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
31 Aug 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Uday Ghoshal
3 Sep 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Askin Erdogan
6 Sep 2015 Author responded Author comments - Hongliang Tian
Resubmission - Version 2
6 Sep 2015 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Sep 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Uday Ghoshal
7 Oct 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Askin Erdogan
9 Oct 2015 Author responded Author comments - Hongliang Tian
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Oct 2015 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Oct 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Uday Ghoshal
20 Nov 2015 Author responded Author comments - Hongliang Tian
Resubmission - Version 4
20 Nov 2015 Submitted Manuscript version 4
1 Dec 2015 Author responded Author comments - Hongliang Tian
Resubmission - Version 5
1 Dec 2015 Submitted Manuscript version 5
14 Dec 2015 Author responded Author comments - Hongliang Tian
Resubmission - Version 6
14 Dec 2015 Submitted Manuscript version 6
24 Feb 2016 Author responded Author comments - Hongliang Tian
Resubmission - Version 7
24 Feb 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 7
12 Mar 2016 Author responded Author comments - Hongliang Tian
Resubmission - Version 8
12 Mar 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
25 Apr 2016 Editorially accepted
4 May 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12876-016-0466-8

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page