Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
19 May 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
6 Aug 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - E Ebert |
15 Aug 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Francesco Patti |
28 Aug 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Susanna Nikolaus |
13 Oct 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Claudia Pena Rossi |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
13 Oct 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
30 Oct 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - E Ebert |
13 Nov 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Susanna Nikolaus |
27 Nov 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Claudia Pena Rossi |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
27 Nov 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
18 Dec 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Claudia Pena Rossi |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
18 Dec 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
10 Feb 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Claudia Pena Rossi |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
10 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
16 Mar 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Claudia Pena Rossi |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
16 Mar 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
20 Mar 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
20 Mar 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-230X-9-22 |
You can find further information about peer review here.