Peer Review reports
From: Endoscopic findings in uninvestigated dyspepsia
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 4 Apr 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Malfertheiner |
| 10 May 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rodrigo Machado |
| 21 Aug 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Jacob Faintuch |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 21 Aug 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 21 Aug 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Jacob Faintuch |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 21 Aug 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 7 Nov 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marek Brabec |
| 9 Dec 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Jacob Faintuch |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 9 Dec 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 26 Dec 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marek Brabec |
| 2 Jan 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Jacob Faintuch |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 2 Jan 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 8 Jan 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Jacob Faintuch |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 8 Jan 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 29 Jan 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
| 6 Feb 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-230X-14-19 |
You can find further information about peer review here.