Peer Review reports
From: T.E.A. Study: three-day ertapenem versus three-day Ampicillin-Sulbactam
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 29 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Vitaliy Poylin |
| 27 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dimitrios Matthaiou |
| 29 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Fausto Catena |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 29 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 9 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Vitaliy Poylin |
| 18 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dimitrios Matthaiou |
| 4 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Fausto Catena |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 4 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 19 Dec 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 30 Apr 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-230X-13-76 |
You can find further information about peer review here.