Skip to main content

Table 2 Mortality and various clinical parameters

From: Comparative analysis of primary repair vs resection and anastomosis, with laparostomy, in management of typhoid intestinal perforation: results of a rural hospital in northwestern Benin

Clinical and laboratory parameters

Died (%)

p

Type of surgery

 Primary Repair (Group A) *

31%

0.13

 Intestinal resection + anastomosis (Group B)**

40%

Total interventions (initial surgery plus laparostomy revisions) per patient (***)

 1 intervention

56.5%

0.021

 2 interventions

29.4%

 3 interventions

15%

 4 interventions

20%

 > 4 interventions

21.4%

Age

 Age < 10 years

26.4%

0.46

 Age > 10 years

34%

Sex

 Males

30.6%

0.67

 Females

31.4%

Number of perforations at initial surgery

 Perforations ≤ 2

30.5%

0.72

 Perforations > 2

41.1%

Site of perforations

 Perforation distance from valve < 30 cm

31.0%

0.17

 Perforation distance from valve > 30 cm

57.1%

Presence of pus in peritoneum at initial surgery

 Presence of pus in peritoneum

84.6%

0.0001

 Absence of pus in peritoneum

15.3%

Blood cell count at initial surgery

 WBC > 10.000

25%

 

 WBC < 3.000

100%

0.003

 WBC 3.000 – 10.000

21.6%

 

Hb at initial surgery

 Hb < 9 g/dl

19%

0.32

 Hb > 9 g/dl

26%

  1. (*) Group A: 26 patients, 6 lost to follow-up: 20 evaluable.
  2. (**) Group B: 75 patients, 17 lost to follow-up: 58 evaluable.
  3. (***) 1 intervention = initial laparotomy only.
  4. 2 interventions = first laparotomy + 1 laparostomy revision.
  5. 3 interventions = first laparotomy + 2 laparostomy revisions.
  6. 4 interventions = first laparotomy + 3 laparostomy revisions.
  7. > 4 interventions = first laparotomy + > 3 laparostomy revisions.