Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of methodological assesment

From: Role of vitamin K2 in preventing the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after curative treatment: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

 

Mizuta et al.

Yoshida et al.

Yojishi et al.

Kakizaki et al.

Hotta et al.

Randomization*

No

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Concealment to Treatment Allocation

No@

Yes

Yes

No@

Unclear

Avoidance of co-interventions

Yes

Yes#

Yes%

Yes

Yes

Similarity of groups at baseline

No+

Yes&

Yes

Yes

Yes

Eligibility Criteria

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Blinding methods

No

Yes Invesitgator, study sponsor and patients

Yes

No

Unclear

Intention to Treat Analysis

Yes

Unclear

Unlcear

Unlcear

Unclear

  1. *From Randomization, we mean whether the randomization methods have been described in methods as all these are RCT’s.
  2. @We presume that the treatment allocation was not concealed as the control groups did not receive placebo.
  3. #Use of glycirrhizic acid for the treatment of chronic hepatitis was not considered as an intervention.
  4. &Only the difference in AST levels was statistically significant.
  5. +The difference in the PIVKA 2 levels in baseline groups was statistically significant.
  6. %We do not consider use of ACE-Inhibitors as a co-intervention as we have excluded those patients from the analysis.