Skip to main content

Table 1 The characteristics of included trials comparing the VSC with the SAC

From: Does the variable-stiffness colonoscope makes colonoscopy easier? A meta-analysis of the efficacy of the variable stiffness colonoscope compared with the standard adult colonoscope

study, year, country

cecal intubation rate

cecal intubation time

sedation dose

Pain score

ancillary maneuvers

number of patient (n)

colonoscope types

endoscopists' experience level

Akira Horiuchi 2004, Japan

PVSC:95% (117/123) SAC:91% (114/125) P=0.075

Mean(SD),min PVSC:6.8(5.2) SAC:7.5(4.8) P=0.082

Mean, Midazolam,mg PVSC:6.5 SAC:7.3 P=0.76

not stated

Position changes made PVSC:0% SAC:5% P<0.0001 Manual pressure used PVSC:66% SAC:69% P=0.55

PVSC, small-caliber PVSC, SAC

374

Experienced

Al-Shurieki SH 2005,USA

PVSC:95.8% (115/120) SAC:96.6% (114/118) P=1.0

Mean(SD),min PVSC:7.8(5.67) SAC:7.9(3.77) P=0.28

Mean, Meperidine,mg PVSC:56(15) SAC:60(15) P=0.06 Midazolam,mg PVSC:2.2(0.79) SAC:2.5(0.78) P=0.02

Median patient experience scale PVSC:1 SAC:83% SAC:1 P=0.6

position change made PVSC:76% P=0.2 manual pressure used PVSC:29% SAC:32% P=0.64

238

PVSC,SAC

Experienced

Brooker JC 2000,UK

VSC:96.5% (55/57) SAC:90.7 (39/43) P=n.s.

Median(range),min VSC:6min32sec(1 min50sec-19min35sec) SAC:10min35sec(3min45sec-22min35sec) P=0.0005

Median(range) Pethidine,mg VSC:25(0–75) SCA:37.5(0–100)SCA:1.5(0–2.5)

Median Pain Score rated by patients VSC:7(0–82) SAC:24(0–85) P=0.0081

not stated

100

VSC,SAC

Experienced

Darlus Sorbi 2001,USA

VSC:100% (25/25) SAC:88% (22/25) P=0.11

Mean ± SEM VSC:10.6 ± 1.6SAC:10.6 ± 1.7 P=0.97

Mean ± SEM Meperidine,mg VSC:68 ± 7 SAC:67 ± 5 P=0.68 Midazolam,mg VSC:4.3 ± 0.6 SAC:4.1 ± 0.3 P=0.84

Mean ± SEM Pain score reported by patients VSC:1.3 ± 0.4 SAC:1.8 ± 0.6 P=0.64

Mean ± SEM positon changes VSC:0.4 ± 0.1 SAC:1.2 ± 0.4 P=0.46 manual pressure used VSC:0.3 ± 0.1 SAC:1.1 ± 0.4 P=0.05

50

VSC,SAC

limited experienced

Ichiro Yoshikawa 2002,Japan

experienced VSC:99% (103/104) SAC:98% (101/103) P=n.s. Limited experience VSC:98% (127/129) SAC:95 (125/131) P=n.s.

experienced VSC:9.8 ± 6.6 SAC:10.6 ± 7.2 P=n.s. Limited experience VSC:15.7 ± 9.7 SAC:18.5 ± 12.1 P<0.05

not stated

Mean(SD) Pain score rated by patients experienced VSC:1.4 ± 1.1 SAC:1.9 ± 1.1 P<0.01 limited experience VSC:1.7 ± 1.0 SAC:2.1 ± 1.2 P<0.01

Manual pressure used experienced VSC:10% SAC:15% P=n.s. Limited experience VSC:35% SAC:45% P=n.s.

467

VSC,SAC

experienced, limited experience

Lee WH 2007,China

VSC:97% (108/111) SAC:93% (102/110)P=0.28

Mean ± SD VSC:12.4 ± 6.8 SAC:13.2 ± 11.7 P=0.55

Mean(SD) Propofol,mg/kg VSC:0.75 ± 0.65 SAC:0.93 ± 0.62 P=0.02

Mean(SD) Pain score rated by patients VSC:4.6(2.7) SAC:5.9(2.5) P=0.589

Position change made VSC:23% SAC:34% P=0.01 Manual pressure used VSC:23% SAC:37% P=0.08

335

VSC,SAC

Experienced

Shumaker DA 2002,USA

PVSC:94.3% (115/122) SAC:89.8% (114/12) P=0.099

mean(SD) PVSC:9.4(6.8) SAC:7.9(4.5) P=0.089

Mean(SD) Meperidine,mg PVSC:73(23) SAC:77(25) P=0.168 Fentanyl,mg PVSC:93(35) SAC:93(26) P=0.039 Midazolam,mg PVSC:2.9(1.0) SAC:3.0(1.0) P=0.081

Mean(SD) Pain score rated by patients PVSC:3.9(3.2) SAC:4.1(3.0) P=0.589

position change PVSC:33% SAC:33% P=0.96 manual pressure used PVSC:58% SAC:42% P=0.024

363

PVSC,SAC,pediatric colonoscope

Experienced

Sola-Vera J 2011, Spain

VSC:92.9% (52/56) SAC:90.7% (49/54) P=0.7

Mean(SD) VSC:6.14(3.5) SAC:7.7(3.8) P=0.035

Mean(SD) Propofol, mg VSC:155.1 ± 83.3 SAC:176.2 ± 91.2 P=0.2 Fentanyl,mg VSC:0.11 ± 0.03 SAC:0.13 ± 0.04 P=0.06 Midazolam, mg VSC:1.3 ± 0.5 SAC:1.1 ± 0.7 P=0.1

Mean(SD) Pain rated by patients VSC:2.4 ± 4.8 SAC:2.3 ± 4.4 P=0.9

Manual pressure used VSC:44.6% SAC:44.4% P=1.0 position change VSC:12.5% SAC:33.3% P=0.012

124

VSC,SAC

Experienced