Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 1 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Naomi Swanson |
| 23 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter White |
| 25 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Panayotis Ferentinos |
| 19 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Halvor Naess |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 19 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| 16 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter White |
| 28 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Halvor Naess |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 28 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 27 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Simon Wessely |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 8 Feb 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 8 Feb 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-230X-12-13 |
You can find further information about peer review here.