Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Is hepatotropic contrast enhanced MR a more effective method in differential diagnosis of hemangioma than multi-phase CT and unenhanced MR?

Original Submission
2 Apr 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
9 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Tomasz Krystian Nowicki
19 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Takamichi Murakami
6 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - herve trillaud
Resubmission - Version 2
9 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
13 Feb 2011 Author responded Author comments - Tomasz Krystian Nowicki
22 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Takamichi Murakami
1 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - herve trillaud
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Feb 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
27 Mar 2011 Author responded Author comments - Tomasz Krystian Nowicki
5 Mar 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Takamichi Murakami
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Mar 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
5 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Tomasz Krystian Nowicki
Resubmission - Version 6
5 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
19 Apr 2011 Editorially accepted
19 Apr 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-230X-11-43

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page