Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
26 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
29 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Greenstein |
21 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Brian Bressler |
23 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Scully |
25 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Timo Rath |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
25 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
27 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Greenstein |
11 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Scully |
14 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Brian Bressler |
27 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Timo Rath |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
27 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
14 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Scully |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
31 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Timo Rath |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
31 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
8 Apr 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
8 Apr 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-230X-11-34 |
You can find further information about peer review here.