Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Comparative cost-efficiency of the EVOTECH endoscope cleaner and reprocessor versus manual cleaning plus automated endoscope reprocessing in a real-world Canadian hospital endoscopy setting

Original Submission
7 Dec 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Lindy Forte
Resubmission - Version 2
4 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lawrence Muscarella
10 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Giancarlo Spinzi
14 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michelle Alfa
14 Mar 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cesare Hassan
4 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Lindy Forte
Resubmission - Version 3
4 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lawrence Muscarella
25 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cesare Hassan
26 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michelle Alfa
8 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Lindy Forte
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
27 Jul 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lawrence Muscarella
8 Aug 2011 Author responded Author comments - Lindy Forte
Resubmission - Version 5
8 Aug 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
29 Sep 2011 Author responded Author comments - Lindy Forte
Resubmission - Version 6
29 Sep 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
3 Oct 2011 Editorially accepted
3 Oct 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-230X-11-105

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page