Peer Review reports
From: Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy - a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
30 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
18 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ray Garry |
24 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stefan Sauerland |
30 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anette Sundfor Jacobsen |
21 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Xiaohang Li |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
21 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
11 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stefan Sauerland |
22 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anette Sundfor Jacobsen |
30 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Xiaohang Li |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
30 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
1 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Xiaohang Li |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
1 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
2 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Xiaohang Li |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
2 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
3 Nov 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
3 Nov 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-230X-10-129 |
You can find further information about peer review here.