Skip to main content
Download PDF

Clinical factors associated with stable treatment of chronic constipation in Japanese patients

BMC Gastroenterology volumeĀ 24, ArticleĀ number:Ā 52 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background/Aims

Chronic constipation (CC) is one of the most common gastrointestinal disorders in the general population. Although there are many treatment options, achieving a stable treatment for CC remains one of the challenges in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical factors associated with stable treatment for CC in Japanese patients.

Methods

A retrospective, cross-sectional, and multicenter study was carried out. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they fulfilled the Rome IV criteria for diagnosing CC and had been treated for at least one and a half years. Patients with up to two prescription modifications for CC in one year were defined as the stable treatment group, whereas those with three or more prescription changes were defined as the unstable treatment group. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to identify factors associated with CC.

Results

A total of 114 patients have been recruited. There were 82 patients (77.0%) in the stable treatment group and 32 patients (23.0%) in the unstable treatment group. Based on multivariate likelihood analysis, only using acid-suppressive drugs contributed to stability treatment in CC patients (odds ratio: 2.81, 95% confidence interval: 1.12ā€“7.08, pā€‰=ā€‰0.03).

Conclusion

Administration of acid-suppressive drugs was the only factor related to the stability of CC treatment. Further studies are needed to validate the results as well as clarify the causes.

Peer Review reports

Background

Chronic constipation (CC) is one of the most common gastrointestinal disorders in the general population [1]. In Japan, the prevalence of CC is estimated to be 6.1ā€“28%, depending on the diagnostic scale utilized [2, 3]. CC is characterized by unsatisfactory defecation due to infrequent bowel movements and/or difficulty defecating [4]. Defecation is a physiological phenomenon, and its disturbance can be a severe problem in daily life, causing not only physical symptoms but also psychological symptoms.

Several studies demonstrated that CC has significant deleterious effects on daily life, impairs health-related quality of life, and may impose a considerable social and economic burden [5,6,7]. Therefore, appropriate treatment and maintaining the patientā€™s stable condition are critical in treating CC. Previously, osmotic laxatives and stimulant laxatives were commonly used in Japan, but recently epithelial function-altering drugs, including lubiprostone, linaclotide, and elobixibat have also become increasingly popular [6,7,8]. Thus, therapy options for CC have been expanded, and treatment goals may be attained more readily.

Although there are many treatment options, achieving a stable treatment for CC remains one of the challenges in clinical practice. To the best of our knowledge, there is a lack of published data on the variables that affect CC treatment stability. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the clinical factors associated with stable CC treatment in Japanese patients.

Methods

Study participants

This retrospective, cross-sectional, and multicenter study was carried out in Japan from January to March 2022. Patients with CC who visited Hiroshima University Hospital (Hiroshima, Japan), Kawamura Internal Medicine Clinic (Hiroshima, Japan), and Matsuonaika Hospital (Mihara, Japan) were eligible for inclusion if they were at least 18 years of age, fulfilled the Rome IV criteria [4] for the diagnosis of CC, and had been treated CC for at least one and a half year. Patients were excluded if they had one or more of the following conditions: inflammatory bowel diseases such as ulcerative colitis or Crohnā€™s disease, gastrointestinal malignancies, pregnancy, secondary constipation, drug-induced constipation, not willing to participate in the study. All physicians participating in the study were gastroenterologists. We made a treatment plan based on various factors, including the patientā€™s reported Bristol Stool Form Scale type, bowel frequency, and satisfaction with the treatment.

Diagnostic criteria of CC

According to the Rome IV criteria [4], the diagnosis of CC was made when at least two of the following conditions were present: (1) straining during more than one-fourth (25%) of the defecations; (2) lumpy or hard stools (Bristol stool form [9] scale 1 or 2) in more than one-fourth (25%) of the defecations; (3) a sensation of incomplete evacuation in more than one-fourth (25%) of the defecations; (4) a sensation of anorectal obstruction/blockage in more than one-fourth (25%) of the defecations; (5) performance of manual maneuvers (digital evacuation or pelvic floor assistance) to facilitate more than one-fourth (25%) of the defecations; and (6) fewer than three spontaneous bowel movements per week. The above criteria must have been fulfilled during the last three months, with the onset of symptoms occurring at least six months prior to diagnosis.

Definition of stable and unstable treatment groups

Patients were divided into two groups: stable and unstable treatment groups. Patients were classified as unstable if their initial laxative therapy progressed through the switch, augmentation, or dose adjustment [10]. Patients with up to two prescription modifications for CC in one year were defined as the stable treatment group, whereas those with three or more prescription changes were defined as the unstable treatment group. All patients were observed for six months prior to categorizing them as having stable or unstable constipation because some patients had to alter their medication regimens within the initial six months following treatment initiation. This helps limit confounding factors and provides a more rigorous definition of constipation stability.

Data collection

The following items were extracted from the electronic medical records: age, sex, body mass index (BMI), history of abdominal surgery, hemoglobin, liver function, kidney function, past history (diabetes, thyroid dysfunction, mental disorders, dementia, Parkinsonā€™s disease), use of acid-suppressive drugs, use of prokinetic drugs, and use of 3 or more types of drugs for CC. The most recent blood test results were utilized in the study.

Obesity was determined as a BMIā€‰ā‰„ā€‰30Ā kg/m2, while underweight was defined as a BMIā€‰ā‰¤ā€‰18.5Ā kg/m2 [11]. Anemia was identified as hemoglobin below 13Ā g/dL for males and below 12Ā g/dL for females. Abnormal liver function was described if AST was greater than 36 U/L or ALT was greater than 41 U/L. Abnormal kidney function was reported if creatinine levels were ā‰„ā€‰1.1Ā mg/dL in males and ā‰„ā€‰0.9Ā mg/dL in females. Acid-suppressive drugs included histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RA) (famotidine), proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) (esomeprazole, lansoprazole, omeprazole, and rabeprazole), and potassium-competitive acid blockers (vonoprazan). Prokinetic drugs included acotiamide, mosapride, pantethine, and rikkunshito. Short-term (less than six months) administration of acid-suppressive agents was ruled out. Laxatives included magnesium oxide, polyethylene glycol/electrolyte solution, sennoside, senna, bisacodyl, sodium picosulfate, sodium bicarbonate, lubiprostone, linaclotide, and elobixibat.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, U.S.A.). Continuous variables were summarized as means (Ā±ā€‰SD), whereas categorical variables were summarized as proportions or percentages. The studentā€™s t-test was used to evaluate the continuous variables. Categorical variables were analyzed using Ļ‡2 and Fisherā€™s exact tests as appropriate. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to identify factors associated with CC. We used logistic regression models for multivariable analyses to identify clinical factors and to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals. p valuesā€‰<ā€‰0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Clinical features of study participants

There were 114 patients who met the criteria for inclusion. The clinical features of the patients are presented in TableĀ 1. The mean age of patients was 76.7ā€‰Ā±ā€‰13, with a range of 33ā€“101 years. The ratio of male-to-female was 1:1.67. Nineteen patients (16.7%) needed three or more types of laxatives for the treatment of CC. The rate of patients with mental disorders and dementia was 13.2% and 5.3%, respectively.

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of studying patients and the comparison between the stable treatment and unstable treatment group
Full size table

Association between clinical characteristics and treatment status for chronic constipation

There were 82 patients (77.0%) in the stable treatment group and 32 (23.0%) in the unstable treatment group. The only significant difference was the use of acid-suppressive medications between the two groups (68.3% for the stable treatment group vs. 40.6% for the unstable treatment group, pā€‰<ā€‰0.05). Of the 82 patients in the stable group, 56 patients (68.3%) were using acid-suppressive drugs, including vonoprazan (6 patients), PPIs (45 patients), and H2RA (5 patients). On the other hand, 13 (40.6%) of the 32 patients in the unstable group were using acid-suppressive drugs, including vonoprazan (1 patient), PPIs (10 patients), and H2RA (10 patients). No other differences were found in the univariate analysis of all other clinical factors (TableĀ 1).

Based on multivariate likelihood analysis, only the use of acid-suppressive drugs contributed to stability treatment in patients with CC (odds ratio (OR): 2.81, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12ā€“7.08, pā€‰=ā€‰0.03) (TableĀ 2).

Table 2 Summary of multivariable logistic regression analysis
Full size table

Discussion

This study suggests that using acid-suppressive drugs may be a significant factor associated with the stability of CC treatment. No prior studies have evaluated the correlation between utilizing acid-suppressive medications and stable treatment in patients with CC. There are two possible reasons. The first reason is that the overlap of functional gastrointestinal disorders is common in patients with CC, particularly functional dyspepsia (FD) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) [12, 13]. A prospective nationwide multi-center study of 759 CC patients in Korea showed that 10.5% of CC patients had FD overlap, 17.9% had overlap GERD, and 6.7% had both GERD and FD overlap [13]. Many studies have demonstrated the efficacy of acid-suppressive drugs for the treatment of FD and GERD, regardless of the dose and duration of treatment compared to placebo [14,15,16]. As a result, improving FD and GERD symptoms with acid-suppressive drugs may also reduce the symptoms of CC and contribute to the stability of treatment in CC patients. Moreover, functional gastrointestinal disorders, including FD and CC are associated with and accompanied by mental disorders such as depression, and emotional stress [17, 18]. In our study, the stable treatment group had more patients with mental disorders than the unstable treatment group. Therefore, alleviating FD symptoms with acid-suppressive drugs may reduce stress levels and stabilize CC treatment. This can be explained by several reasons. The gut-brain axis connects the gastrointestinal tract and the brain [19]. When the gastric produces excessive acid, it can lead to physical discomfort and contribute to stress and anxiety. Acid-suppressing drugs may improve these physical symptoms by reducing gastric acid production, which assists in reducing stress levels. Additionally, it has been demonstrated that there may be a direct relationship between gastric acid and stress hormones. Excessive gastric acid can stimulate the production of stress hormones, such as cortisol [20]. As a result, reducing gastric acid may have the opposite effect and decrease stress levels.

Another reason is that acid-suppressive drugs may affect the intestinal bacteria that stabilize CC therapy. The intestinal microbiota is a collection of microorganisms that reside in the gastrointestinal tract and have recently been shown to conduct many critical health-promoting functions [21, 22]. It is known that the number of gastrointestinal bacteria in CC patients is approximately 10 times higher than the number of cells in the human body, with up to 1000 different bacterial species [23]. Alterations of intestinal microbiota in patients with CC can be characterized by a relative decrease in obligate bacteria (e.g. Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium and Bacteroides spp) and a parallel increase in potentially pathogenic microorganisms (e.g. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Campylobacter jejuni) [24, 25]. These alterations may affect intestinal motility and secretory functions by changing the amount of available physiologically active substances and the metabolic environment of the gut, and may be one of the causes of constipation. It has been reported that using proton-pump inhibitors, one of the acid-suppressive drugs, increases the number of oral commensal bacteria in the intestinal microbiota and alters the intestinal microbiota [26,27,28]. Therefore, it is possible that alterations in the intestinal microflora induced by the use of acid-suppressive drugs contributed to the stabilization of constipation treatment.

In our study, 11.4% of patients were prescribed prokinetic medications. Prokinetic agents enhance gastrointestinal motility and are considered clinically relevant in the treatment of functional gastrointestinal disorders characterized by impaired motility, including FD and CC [29]. The use of prokinetics in the stable treatment was higher than that in the unstable treatment groups; however, there was no statistically significant difference.

Previous studies have shown that constipation has been associated with increasing age and comorbidities such as diabetes and mental health [1, 30,31,32,33]. Contrary to our expectations, we did not identify a statistically significant difference in CC treatment stability with these comorbidities. Another prospective cohort study over 20 years found that patients with persistent and non-persistent CC have similar clinical characteristics, although those with persistent CC use more laxatives or fiber [34]. In our study, more patients in the unstable treatment group received more than three types of laxatives. However, there was no statistically significant difference. Further research would be necessary to examine these correlations.

According to our results, many patients were in the geriatric group and had comorbidities such as dementia, hypothyroidism, and psychiatric disorders. These comorbidities have been reported to induce constipation; however, multivariate analysis in this study did not identify any association between these factors and stabilized CC treatment.

This study has several limitations. First, our study had a limited number of cases and participating institutions, as well as the different distribution of numbers between the two groups. Due to the small size, we can not address the type of acid-suprressive in our study. The main reason for the small study size was that the number of patients continuously observed and treated for one and a half years in each medical facility was not so many. Second, medical history and comorbidities were retrospectively analyzed based on medical records, which may have been insufficient. For example, we do not have detailed information on other potentially confounding items such as antibiotic and supplement use, alcohol, and smoking history. Third, medication modifications were left to the judgment of each treating physician, with no standardized criteria. The decision to switch prescriptions was mainly based on the patientā€™s subjectively reported symptoms and level of satisfaction, both of which may have been subjective. Fourth, the period time to assess whether the treatment is stable or not in our study is relatively short. More clinical factors contributing to treatment stability may become apparent with additional time. Fifth, we do not have enough information to diagnose the patients with FD, GERD, and the overlapping between CC and FD/GERD, as well as irritable bowel syndrome with constipation. This would be a crucial research question for future studies of our group.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the administration of acid-suppressive drugs was the only factor related to the stability of CC treatment. Further studies are required to validate the findings as well as clarify the causes.

Data availability

All data generated during this study are included in this article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

CC:

Chronic constipation

OR:

odds ratio

CI:

confidence interval

References

  1. Suares NC, Ford AC. Prevalence of, and risk factors for, chronic idiopathic constipation in the community: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106(9):1582ā€“91. quiz 1581, 1592.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  2. Tamura A, Tomita T, Oshima T, Toyoshima F, Yamasaki T, Okugawa T, Kondo T, Kono T, Tozawa K, Ikehara H, et al. Prevalence and self-recognition of chronic constipation: results of an internet survey. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;22(4):677ā€“85.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  3. Ono M, Kato M, Miyamoto S, Tsuda M, Mizushima T, Ono S, Nakagawa M, Mabe K, Nakagawa S, Muto S, et al. Multicenter observational study on functional bowel disorders diagnosed using Rome III diagnostic criteria in Japan. J Gastroenterol. 2018;53(8):916ā€“23.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  4. Gastroenterology, JSo. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for chronic constipation 2017, ed. Research society for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic constipation, affiliated to the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology in Japanese. Tokyo: Nankodo Co, Ltd; 2017.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  5. Sun SX, Dibonaventura M, Purayidathil FW, Wagner JS, Dabbous O, Mody R. Impact of chronic constipation on health-related quality of life, work productivity, and healthcare resource use: an analysis of the National Health and Wellness Survey. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56(9):2688ā€“95.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  6. Fukudo S, Hongo M, Kaneko H, Takano M, Ueno R. Lubiprostone increases spontaneous bowel movement frequency and quality of life in patients with chronic idiopathic constipation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13(2):294ā€“301e295.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  7. Fukudo S, Miwa H, Nakajima A, Kinoshita Y, Kosako M, Hayashi K, Akiho H, Kuroishi K, Johnston JM, Currie M, et al. High-dose linaclotide is effective and safe in patients with chronic constipation: a phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with a long-term open-label extension study in Japan. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019;31(1):e13487.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  8. Nakajima A, Seki M, Taniguchi S, Ohta A, Gillberg PG, Mattsson JP, Camilleri M. Safety and efficacy of elobixibat for chronic constipation: results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial and an open-label, single-arm, phase 3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;3(8):537ā€“47.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  9. Lewis SJ, Heaton KW. Stool form scale as a useful guide to intestinal transit time. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997;32(9):920ā€“4.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  10. Morgan CL, Jenkins-Jones S, Knaggs R, Currie C, Conway P, Poole CD, Berni E. Characterization and Associated costs of Constipation relating to exposure to strong opioids in England: an observational study. Clin Ther. 2021;43(6):968ā€“89.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  11. Obesity JSftSo.: Guidelines for the management of obesity disease 2016. In.: Life Science Publishing Tokyo; 2016.

  12. Vakil N, Stelwagon M, Shea EP, Miller S. Symptom burden and consulting behavior in patients with overlapping functional disorders in the US population. United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2016;4(3):413ā€“22.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  13. Park KS, Jee SR, Lee BE, Hong KS, Shin JE, Na SY, Kwon JG, Choi SC, Kim YS, Lee HS, et al. Nationwide Multicenter Study for overlaps of Common Functional Gastrointestinal disorders in Korean patients with constipation. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017;23(4):569ā€“77.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  14. Pinto-Sanchez MI, Yuan Y, Hassan A, Bercik P, Moayyedi P. Proton pump inhibitors for functional dyspepsia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;11(11):Cd011194.

    PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  15. Moayyedi P, Soo S, Deeks J, Delaney B, Innes M, Forman D. Pharmacological interventions for non-ulcer dyspepsia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006(4):Cd001960.

  16. Asaoka D, Nagahara A, Hojo M, Matsumoto K, Ueyama H, Matsumoto K, Izumi K, Takeda T, Komori H, Akazawa Y, et al. Efficacy of a potassium-competitive acid blocker for improving symptoms in patients with reflux esophagitis, non-erosive reflux disease, and functional dyspepsia. Biomed Rep. 2017;6(2):175ā€“80.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  17. Devanarayana NM, Rajindrajith S. Association between constipation and stressful life events in a cohort of Sri Lankan children and adolescents. J Trop Pediatr. 2010;56(3):144ā€“8.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  18. Nellesen D, Chawla A, Oh DL, Weissman T, Lavins BJ, Murray CW. Comorbidities in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation or chronic idiopathic constipation: a review of the literature from the past decade. Postgrad Med. 2013;125(2):40ā€“50.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  19. Rhee SH, Pothoulakis C, Mayer EA. Principles and clinical implications of the brain-gut-enteric microbiota axis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;6(5):306ā€“14.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  20. Carabotti M, Scirocco A, Maselli MA, Severi C. The gut-brain axis: interactions between enteric microbiota, central and enteric nervous systems. Ann Gastroenterol. 2015;28(2):203ā€“9.

    PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  21. Troy EB, Kasper DL. Beneficial effects of Bacteroides fragilis polysaccharides on the immune system. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2010;15(1):25ā€“34.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  22. Diaz Heijtz R, Wang S, Anuar F, Qian Y, Bjƶrkholm B, Samuelsson A, Hibberd ML, Forssberg H, Pettersson S. Normal gut microbiota modulates brain development and behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(7):3047ā€“52.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  23. Blaser M, Bork P, Fraser C, Knight R, Wang J. The microbiome explored: recent insights and future challenges. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013;11(3):213ā€“7.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  24. Gerritsen J, Smidt H, Rijkers GT, de Vos WM. Intestinal microbiota in human health and disease: the impact of probiotics. Genes Nutr. 2011;6(3):209ā€“40.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  25. Kirgizov IV, Sukhorukov AM, Dudarev VA, Istomin AA. Hemostasis in children with dysbacteriosis in chronic constipation. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2001;7(4):335ā€“8.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  26. Imhann F, Bonder MJ, Vich Vila A, Fu J, Mujagic Z, Vork L, Tigchelaar EF, Jankipersadsing SA, Cenit MC, Harmsen HJ, et al. Proton pump inhibitors affect the gut microbiome. Gut. 2016;65(5):740ā€“8.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  27. Jackson MA, Goodrich JK, Maxan ME, Freedberg DE, Abrams JA, Poole AC, Sutter JL, Welter D, Ley RE, Bell JT, et al. Proton pump inhibitors alter the composition of the gut microbiota. Gut. 2016;65(5):749ā€“56.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  28. Freedberg DE, Toussaint NC, Chen SP, Ratner AJ, Whittier S, Wang TC, Wang HH, Abrams JA. Proton Pump inhibitors alter specific Taxa in the human gastrointestinal microbiome: a crossover trial. Gastroenterology. 2015;149(4):883ā€“885e889.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  29. Quigley EM. Prokinetics in the management of Functional Gastrointestinal disorders. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;21(3):330ā€“6.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  30. Bharucha AE, Pemberton JH, Locke GR. 3rd: American Gastroenterological Association technical review on constipation. Gastroenterology. 2013;144(1):218ā€“38.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  31. Vinik AI, Erbas T. Diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;117:279ā€“94.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  32. Han SH, Lee OY, Lee YS, Kim KB, Yoon BC, Choi HS. Anxiety, depression and sleep disturbance in female constipation predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Kor J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2005;11(1):66ā€“71.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  33. Cheng C, Chan AO, Hui WM, Lam SK. Coping strategies, illness perception, anxiety and depression of patients with idiopathic constipation: a population-based study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;18(3):319ā€“26.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  34. Choung RS, Locke GR 3rd, Rey E, Schleck CD, Baum C, Zinsmeister AR, Talley NJ. Factors associated with persistent and nonpersistent chronic constipation, over 20 years. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10(5):494ā€“500.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Shinji Tanaka, Honorary Professor, Hiroshima University and President of Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society for his support.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan

    Kazuki Ishibashi,Ā Nhu Thi Hanh Vu,Ā Takeo Nakamura,Ā Hirona Konishi,Ā Junichi Mizuno,Ā Motomitsu Fukuhara,Ā Hidehiko Takigawa,Ā Ryo YugeĀ &Ā Shiro Oka

  2. Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and Medicine, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan

    Yuji Urabe

  3. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam

    Nhu Thi Hanh VuĀ &Ā Duc Trong Quach

  4. Health Service Center, Hiroshima University, 1-7-1 Kagamiyama, 739-8514, Higashihiroshima, Japan

    Shunsuke MiyauchiĀ &Ā Toru Hiyama

Authors
  1. Kazuki Ishibashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedĀ Google Scholar

  2. Yuji Urabe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedĀ Google Scholar

  3. Nhu Thi Hanh Vu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedĀ Google Scholar

  4. Shunsuke Miyauchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedĀ Google Scholar

  5. Takeo Nakamura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedĀ Google Scholar

  6. Hirona Konishi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedĀ Google Scholar

  7. Junichi Mizuno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedĀ Google Scholar

  8. Motomitsu Fukuhara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedĀ Google Scholar

  9. Hidehiko Takigawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedĀ Google Scholar

  10. Ryo Yuge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedĀ Google Scholar

  11. Duc Trong Quach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedĀ Google Scholar

  12. Shiro Oka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedĀ Google Scholar

  13. Toru Hiyama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedĀ Google Scholar

Contributions

TH contributed to the conception. KI, TN, HK, JM, MF acquired date, and SM, HT, RY, NTHV analyzed and interpreted data. KI, NTHV drafted the article. TH, DTQ, YU, SO revised the manuscript. All authors have approved the submitted manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toru Hiyama.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Hiroshima University (Approval No. 4090). The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki by the World Medical Association. Due to the retrospective character of the study, informed consent was waived by the Ethical Committee of Hiroshima University.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisherā€™s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the articleā€™s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the articleā€™s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ishibashi, K., Urabe, Y., Vu, N.T.H. et al. Clinical factors associated with stable treatment of chronic constipation in Japanese patients. BMC Gastroenterol 24, 52 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-024-03140-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-024-03140-y

Keywords

BMC Gastroenterology

ISSN: 1471-230X

Contact us