Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Prevalence and associated factors of viral hepatitis and transferrin elevations in 5036 patients admitted to the emergency room of a Swiss university hospital: cross-sectional study

  • Stefan Russmann1, 2, 3Email author,
  • Emmilia A Dowlatshahi1,
  • Gert Printzen4,
  • Susanne Habicht5,
  • Jürg Reichen1, 6 and
  • Heinz Zimmermann5
BMC Gastroenterology20077:5

DOI: 10.1186/1471-230X-7-5

Received: 15 December 2006

Accepted: 05 February 2007

Published: 05 February 2007

Abstract

Background

The epidemiology of liver disease in patients admitted to emergency rooms is largely unknown. The current study aimed to measure the prevalence of viral hepatitis B and C infection and pathological laboratory values of liver disease in such a population, and to study factors associated with these measurements.

Methods

Cross-sectional study in patients admitted to the emergency room of a university hospital. No formal exclusion criteria. Determination of anti-HBs, anti-HCV, transferrin saturation, alanine aminotransferase, and obtaining answers from a study-specific questionnaire.

Results

The study included 5'036 patients, representing a 14.9% sample of the target population during the study period. Prevalence of anti-HBc and anti-HCV was 6.7% (95%CI 6.0% to 7.4%) and 2.7% (2.3% to 3.2%), respectively. Factors independently associated with positive anti-HBc were intravenous drug abuse (OR 18.3; 11.3 to 29.7), foreign country of birth (3.4; 2.6 to 4.4), non-white ethnicity (2.7; 1.9 to 3.8) and age ≥60 (2.0; 1.5 to 2.8). Positive anti-HCV was associated with intravenous drug abuse (78.9; 43.4 to 143.6), blood transfusion (1.7; 1.1 to 2.8) and abdominal pain (2.7; 1.5 to 4.8). 75% of all participants were not vaccinated against hepatitis B or did not know their vaccination status. Among anti-HCV positive patients only 49% knew about their infection and 51% reported regular alcohol consumption. Transferrin saturation was elevated in 3.3% and was associated with fatigue (prevalence ratio 1.9; 1.2 to 2.8).

Conclusion

Emergency rooms should be considered as targets for public health programs that encourage vaccination, patient education and screening of high-risk patients for liver disease with subsequent referral for treatment if indicated.

Background

Worldwide, about 350 million persons have chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, and about 125 million have been infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV), putting viral hepatitis B and C amongst the world's greatest infectious disease health problems [13]. Many patients are not aware of their chronic disease, and this is also true for another chronic liver disease, namely hereditary haemochromatosis, which is the most common autosomal recessive genetic disorder in Europe [4]. Viral hepatitis B and C, and haemochromatosis have in common that they may lead to liver cirrhosis and subsequently to liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma, and that these complications can be prevented in most patients if diagnosis is made early and patients receive adequate treatment. Therefore these liver diseases are attractive candidates for public health measures aiming at prevention, early diagnosis and treatment. In this context not only information on the general population, but also on selected populations with a potentially higher risk is important. The setting of emergency rooms is particularly attractive for screening because patients can be directly educated about viral hepatitis, and treatment is readily available if necessary. A US based study determined the prevalence of HBV and HCV infection in an emergency room patient population in the early 1990s [5], but no comparable studies were done recently or in Europe. Likewise no previous studies have looked at the prevalence of elevated transferrin saturation (TFS) and its association with clinical symptoms of haemochromatosis and other liver diseases in such a population. We therefore aimed to study the epidemiology of these liver diseases in patients admitted to a university hospital emergency room.

Methods

Setting

The study was conducted in the emergency room (ER) of the University Hospital Berne where patients are admitted 24 hours per day, 365 days per year. The ER admits about 20'000 patients per year from urban Berne as well as from the surrounding rural areas. These include any medical, surgical and subspecialty emergencies, except paediatric, gynaecologic and obstetric emergencies, which are generally admitted to other specialised clinics. The study was approved and supervised by the regional ethics board (Kantonale Ethikkommission Bern).

Subject recruitment and data collection

The a priori target was to include a representative sample of 5'000 patients from the population of all patients admitted to the ER. Patients were recruited between February 2003 and September 2004. There were no formal exclusion criteria, but any individual patient could only be included once. During an initial pilot phase of about two months we asked only a sample of patients admitted to the ER to participate in the study (increasing rate from 1 in 10 to 1 in 2 patients, selected by random sampling). Thereafter all patients were asked to participate in the study. Upon arrival and admission to the ER, patients were given a patient information sheet, an informed consent sheet, and a study-specific questionnaire, which was available in German, French, Italian and English (Table 1). Treating physicians and nurses provided additional information, answered any study-related questions and obtained a 10 ml venous blood sample. Demographic data were collected through the ER's electronic patient data system.
Table 1

Study-specific patient questionnaire

Questions

Answer options

Have you been vaccinated against hepatitis B ?

Yes/No/I don't know

Do you have any known hepatitis B infection ?

Yes/No

Do you have any known hepatitis C infection ?

Yes/No

Have you ever had a yellowing of the skin (known as jaundice) ?

Yes/No

Have you ever had a blood transfusion ?

Yes/No, if yes until/after 1990 ?

Do you have a tattoo ?

Yes/No

Do you have any piercing ?

Yes/No

Do you drink alcohol ?

Never/1–10/>10 glasses/week

Have you ever taken illegal intravenous drugs ?

Yes/No

Do you live with a partner in a steady relationship ?

Yes/No

Do you work in the public health services with patient contact ?

Yes/No

Have you been suffering from stomach aches without clear cause ?

Yes/No

Have you been suffering from tiredness without clear cause ?

Yes/No

Have you been suffering from muscle pains without clear cause ?

Yes/No

Have you been suffering from joint pains without clear cause ?

Yes/No

What is your ethnic origin ?

White/Black/Asiatic/other, mixed

Were you born in Switzerland ?

Yes/No, if no specifiy:

Do you permanently reside in Switzerland ?

Yes/No, if no specifiy:

Information on the source population

We obtained complete and reliable individual patient level information (age, sex, country of residence, health insurance, admission specialty, admission time and date) on all patients admitted to the ER during the study period from the hospital's electronic data system. This information was used to compare our study population with the source population, and to standardize prevalence to the source population.

Laboratory analyses

Anti-HBc antibodies were determined with a diagnostic kit from Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics (Vitros Immunodiagnostic Products Anti-HBcAg Reagent Pack). Anti-HCV antibodies were determined using a second generation ELISA (Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Vitros Immunodiagnostic Products Anti-HCV Reagent Pack), measuring anti-HCV-C100-3, anti-C22c and anti-C33c. Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity, serum iron and total iron binding capacity were determined using the laboratory's routine methods. Transferrin saturation (TFS) was calculated as the ratio of serum iron and total iron binding capacity.

Data analysis

Unadjusted prevalence was calculated directly, and 95% confidence intervals were based on a binomial distribution. For anti-HBc and anti-HCV antibodies prevalence was also adjusted by direct standardization to the source population's demographic and admission variables. Univariable (unadjusted) prevalence ratios (PR) were calculated for several independent variables (factors). When confounding by other variables was suspected adjusted relative prevalence rartios were calculated in a restricted population or as a pooled estimate after stratification over categories of potentially confounding variables according to the method of Mantel and Haenszel [6]. Thereafter multivariable logistic regression was used for the simultaneous modelling of independent associations with several variables. We used log-binomial regression as an alternative to logistic regression when log-binomial model fitting could be achieved, in order to estimate prevalence ratios instead of odds ratios [7]. All analyses were done with STATA Version 8.2 for MacOS X (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA).

Results

Demographic and admission data

During the study period a total of 33'703 patients were admitted to the ER; we collected complete data on 5'036 admitted patients, i.e. 14.9 % of the target population. Demographic and admission data of the study and source population are presented in Table 2. As shown, the two populations had overall similar distributions for the available variables, but study participants were more likely to be admitted during daytime and during the summer months, which is most likely attributable to logistic factors of the study.
Table 2

Demographic and admission data of the study and source population

  

Study population

All ER admissions 1

Variable

Strata

n

%

n

%

All patients

 

5'036

100

33'703

100

Sex

Male

3'018

59.9

19'397

57.6

 

Female

2'018

40.1

14'299

42.4

 

Unknown

-

-

7

0.02

Age (years)

< 20

199

4.0

2'380

7.0

 

20–39

1'890

37.5

12'936

38.4

 

40–59

1'610

32.0

9'460

28.1

 

≥ 60

1'337

26.5

8'927

26.5

Admission specialty

Surgery

2'632

52.3

19'730

58.5

 

Medicine

2'336

46.4

13'973

41.5

 

Unknown

68

1.3

-2

-

Admission season

Nov-Apr

1'693

33.6

14'344

42.6

 

May-Oct

3'343

66.4

19'359

57.4

Admission time

Day (7 am – 7 pm)

4'112

81.7

22'917

68.0

 

Night (7 pm – 7 am)

856

17.0

10'786

32.0

 

Unknown

68

1.3

-2

-

Country of residence

Switzerland

4'934

98.0

32'853

97.5

 

Other

102

2.0

850

2.5

Health insurance

Basic

3'964

78.7

27'595

81.9

 

Semi-private

685

13.6

3'650

10.8

 

Private

165

3.3

970

2.9

 

Unknown

222

4.4

1'488

4.4

1All admissions to the emergency room of the University Hospital Berne between 26 February 2003 and 20 September 2004 (data obtained via the hospital's electronic patient data system)

2There were 68 patients who entered the ER and were included in the study, but where the hospital's data system did not have an entry and therefore no information on specialty and time of admission. These are not included in the numbers provided for all admissions.

Questionnaires

Completed questionnaires were available for all included patients. Some patients did not answer all questions, but each question was answered by at least 97%. Particularly those questions that addressed history of HBV and HCV infection revealed interesting results: 42% of all included patients reported that they had not been vaccinated against HBV, and another 33% did not know whether they had been vaccinated. Not surprisingly the proportion of HBV-vaccinated patients decreased with higher age (Figure 1). 86% of anti-HBc positive patients were not aware of their previous HBV infection, and 74% mentioned no history of jaundice. Only 57% of patients who reported a previous HBV infection were anti-HBc positive. Specificity of a positive history of HCV infection obtained through the study questionnaires was also relatively low (73% of those who reported a previous HCV infection were anti-HCV positive), but the proportion of patients who knew about their previous infection was about three times higher for HCV than for HBV (49% vs. 14%). Information on drinking habits obtained from the questionnaires showed that 10% of men vs. 2.3% of women reported consumption of more than 10 alcoholic drinks per week. Among HCV positive patients, 34% had between 1 and 10, and 16% more than 10 alcoholic drinks per week. HCV positive patients therefore had a higher prevalence of having >10 drinks per week (PR 2.5, 95% CI 1.7 to 3.7), and it was not lower in patients who were aware of their HCV infection (PR 2.7). Importantly, patients who knew about their HCV infection did not drink less alcohol. Other results from the questionnaires are presented in Table 3 along with their associations with viral hepatitis serology.
Figure 1

Hepatitis B vaccination status according to patient questionnaires over 4 age categories. As shown, knowledge about vaccination status does not change in relation to age, but the proportion of patients without HBV vaccination increases above the age of 40.

Table 3

Univariable prevalence ratios (PR) for positive viral hepatitis serology

 

Negative hepatitis serology (n = 4'592)

Anti-HBc positive (n = 336)

Anti-HCV positive (n = 135)

Factor

n

(%)1

n

(%)1

PR2

(95%CI)

n

(%)1

PR2

(95%CI)

Demographics

          

Female

1'859

(40.5)

117

(34.8)

0.8

(0.6 to 1.0)

44

(33.1)

0.7

(0.5 to 1.0)

Age

          

   ≤39

1'957

(42.6)

129

(38.4)

1.0

(reference)

59

(43.7)

1.0

(reference)

   40–59

1'440

(31.4)

118

(35.1)

1.2

(1.0 to 1.5)

45

(33.3)

1.1

(0.8 to 1.6)

   ≥60

1'195

(26.0)

89

(26.5)

1.1

(0.9 to 1.4)

31

(23.0)

1.0

(0.7 to 1.5)

Admission

          

Night admission (7 pm–7 am)

625

(15.6)

39

(13.9)

0.9

(0.6 to 1.2)

15

(14.0)

0.9

(0.5 to 1.5)

Nov-April admission

1'557

(33.9)

106

(31.5)

0.9

(0.7 to 1.1)

44

(32.6)

0.9

(0.7 to 1.3)

Medical admission

1'855

(46.3)

153

(54.4)

1.4

(1.1 to 1.7)

55

(40.7)

1.2

(0.8 to 1.7)

(Semi-)private insurance

800

(18.2)

32

(9.9)

0.5

(0.4 to 0.7)

15

(11.8)

0.6

(0.4 to 1.0)

Laboratory results

          

Elevated ALT

835

(18.2)

91

(27.1)

1.6

(1.3 to 2.0)

56

(41.5)

3.1

(2.2 to 4.3)

Transferrin saturation >45%

200

(4.4)

14

(4.2)

1.0

(0.6 to 1.6)

9

(6.7)

1.5

(0.8 to 3.0)

Questionnaire

          

History of jaundice

428

(9.5)

88

(26.9)

3.1

(2.5 to 3.9)

39

(29.5)

3.8

(2.6 to 5.4)

Blood transfusion (any time)

945

(21.2)

71

(22.0)

1.0

(0.8 to 1.3)

38

(30.9)

1.6

(1.1 to 2.4)

Blood transfusion before 1990

453

(10.2)

30

(9.3)

0.9

(0.6 to 1.3)

15

(12.2)

1.2

(0.7 to 2.1)

Tattoo

437

(9.6)

43

(12.9)

1.4

(1.0 to 1.9)

37

(27.4)

3.4

(2.3 to 4.9)

Piercing

486

(10.7)

25

(7.5)

0.7

(0.5 to 1.0)

22

(16.4)

1.6

(1.0 to 2.5)

>10 units alcohol per week

294

(6.5)

37

(11.2)

1.7

(1.3 to 2.4)

22

(16.4)

2.7

(1.7 to 4.2)

Intravenous drug abuse

30

(0.7)

39

(11.7)

9.3

(7.4 to 11.8)

55

(40.7)

37.4

(28.6 to 48.8)

Steady relationship

3'221

(70.9)

229

(70.0)

0.9

(0.7 to 1.2)

72

(53.7)

0.5

(0.4 to 0.7)

Professional patient contact

618

(13.6)

41

(12.4)

0.9

(0.7 to 1.2)

14

(10.4)

0.7

(0.4 to 1.3)

Chronic abdominal pain

373

(8.2)

47

(14.2)

1.8

(1.3 to 2.4)

30

(22.7)

3.1

(2.1 to 4.6)

Chronic fatigue

817

(17.9)

84

(25.2)

1.5

(1.2 to 1.9)

45

(33.6)

2.2

(1.6 to 3.2)

Chronic myalgia

467

(10.2)

42

(12.6)

1.2

(0.9 to 1.7)

21

(15.8)

1.6

(1.0 to 2.6)

Chronic arthralgia

568

(12.5)

57

(17.3)

1.4

(1.1 to 1.9)

27

(20.6)

1.8

(1.2 to 2.7)

Ethnicity other than white

244

(5.4)

65

(19.8)

3.6

(2.8 to 4.6)

10

(7.5)

1.4

(0.7 to 2.6)

Not born in Switzerland

926

(20.3)

160

(47.8)

3.2

(2.6 to 3.9)

30

(22.2)

1.1

(0.8 to 1.7)

Not a Swiss resident

92

(2.0)

7

(2.1)

1.0

(0.5 to 2.1)

2

(1.5)

0.7

(0.2 to 2.9)

1If no information was available for individual patients for a certain factor (e.g. admission time), % is calculated as the proportion of all patients with available information.

2Unadjusted prevalence ratio of positive viral serology for present vs. absent factor (e.g. first row: prevalence ratio of positive anti-HBc in females vs. males), except for age where age ≤39 is defined as the reference category.

Alanine aminotransferase (ALT)

ALT was determined in all but five patients of the study population. Results are presented in Table 4. As shown, women had about half the prevalence of elevated ALT compared to men. There were no pronounced variations over age categories. In search of the most common causes of severe ALT elevations, we also reviewed the ER physicians' reports on all 130 studied patients with an ALT ≥100 U/l, and derived the most likely cause of their elevated ALT. The most common causes were alcohol consumption (n = 18), infection (n = 17), obstructive cholestasis (n = 16), pancreatitis (n = 10), drug-induced (n = 10), abdominal trauma (n = 9) and HCV infection (n = 8). In 28 patients the reports did not provide any information that readily explained their elevated ALT.
Table 4

Sex-specific distribution of ALT expressed as upper limits of normal (ULN) over 4 categories

Men

n

%

≤1× ULN

2'290

75.9

> 1 – 3× ULN

626

20.7

> 3 – 10× ULN

83

2.8

> 10× ULN

19

0.6

Women

n

%

≤1× ULN

1'783

88.3

> 1 – 3× ULN

199

9.9

> 3 – 10× ULN

28

1.4

> 10x ULN

8

0.4

Prevalence of anti-HBc and anti-HCV and associated factors

Out of 5'036 included patients 336 were anti-HBc, and 135 were anti-HCV positive. 46 patients were positive for both anti-HBc and anti-HCV. There were 15 borderline test results for anti-HBc antibodies and 6 for anti-HCV antibodies. All other patients had negative results. Of the 135 anti-HCV positive patients, 21 were later seen in our hepatological outpatient clinic, where anti-HCV was determined with recombinant immunoblot assays (RIBA), and HCV RNA was measured using polymerase chain reaction. Nineteen tested both, RIBA and RNA positive, one RIBA positive and RNA negative, and one RIBA and RNA negative. In this sample, the predictive value positive regarding anti-HCV was therefore 20/21 or 95.2% after confirmatory RIBA. Table 5 shows the resulting observed prevalences of viral hepatitis serology along with estimates that were standardised to the demographic and admission variables of the source population. Anti-HBc prevalence was substantially higher in patients with a foreign country of birth, i.e. 4.5% for patients born in Switzerland vs. 14.4% for those born in any other country, 15.9% for Mediterranean countries, and 20.1% amongst 102 patients born in Italy. Table 3 presents viral serology results in correlation to questionnaire answers, demographic and admission characteristics and laboratory results, and provides univariable prevalence ratios for positive viral serology. This unadjusted analysis suggested an association between positive anti-HCV antibodies and tattoos (PR = 3.4). However, in a stratified Mantel-Haenszel analysis that controlled for IVDA as a confounding factor the adjusted RR was only 1.3 (95% CI 0.9 to 1.7), and also the alternative approaches of an analysis in a restricted study population of patients without IVDA and a multivariable analysis (Table 6) provided similar results. After data exploration with stratified and restricted analyses we selected clinically relevant factors that were associated with positive viral hepatitis serology in the univariable analysis and those that were considered as potential confounders as independent variables in a logistic regression model. The resulting adjusted odds ratios for viral serology are presented in Table 6.
Table 5

Observed and standardised prevalences of positive anti-HBc and anti-HCV antibodies in the study population of 5'036 patients

Prevalence

Anti-HBc + % (95% CI)

Anti-HCV + % (95% CI)

Observed

6.7 (6.0 to 7.4)

2.7 (2.3 to 3.2)

Standardized to age1

6.5 (5.9 to7.2)

2.6 (2.2 to 3.1)

Standardized to admission variables1

6.1 (5.3 to 6.9)

2.4 (1.9 to 2.8)

1Direct standardisation to distribution of age or admission variables (season, daytime and specialty) of the source population, i.e. all 33'703 patients admitted to the emergency room during the study period.

Table 6

Adjusted odds ratios for variables associated with positive viral hepatitis serology

Variables1

Odds ratio

(95%CI)

 

Anti-HBc positive

Female

0.8

(0.7 to 1.1)

Age

  

   ≤39

1.0

(reference)

   40–59

1.5

(1.1 to 2.0)

   ≥60

2.0

(1.5 to 2.8)

Intravenous drug abuse

18.3

(11.3 to 29.7)

Ethnicity not white

2.7

(1.9 to 3.8)

Not born in Switzerland

3.4

(2.6 to 4.4)

>10 units alcohol per week

1.5

(1.0 to 2.2)

 

Anti-HCV positive

Female

0.8

(0.5 to 1.2)

Age

  

   ≤39

1.0

(reference)

   40–59

1.7

(1.0 to 2.9)

   ≥60

1.7

(0.9 to 3.1)

Blood transfusion

1.7

(1.1 to 2.8)

Tattoo

1.7

(0.9 to 3.2)

Piercing

1.1

(0.5 to 2.2)

Intravenous drug abuse

78.9

(43.4 to 143.6)

>10 units alcohol per week

1.1

(0.5 to 2.2)

Steady relationship

0.8

(0.5 to 1.3)

Chronic abdominal pain

2.7

(1.5 to 4.8)

Chronic fatigue

1.2

(0.7 to 2.0)

Chronic arthralgia

1.2

(0.7 to 2.2)

1Multivariable logistic regression models. First column presents all independent variables that were included in the two models with HBV or HCV serology as the dependent variable.

Transferrin saturation (TFS) and associated factors

TFS was available for all but one patient in the study population. 221 patients had a TFS >45% (4.4%; 95% confidence interval 3.8 to 5.0), 145 >50% (2.9%, 2.4 to 3.4), and 97 >55% (1.9%, 1.6 to 2.3). Applying sex-specific limits (>45% in women and >50% in men) prevalence of elevated TFS was 3.3 % (2.8 to 3.8). We observed no marked age-dependent differences. Univariable analysis indicated associations of elevated TFS with elevated ALT (PR 1.5; 1.0 to 2.1), high alcohol consumption (PR 2.4; 1.6 to 3.6), and fatigue (PR 1.9; 1.4 to 2.7), but not with positive anti-HCV (PR 1.1; 0.5 to 2.7). Restriction of the analysis to patients without high alcohol intake, positive anti-HCV or IVDA (remaining n = 4'457) did not substantially change the association of elevated TFS with fatigue or ALT. Using the same restrictions we also fitted a log-binomial regression model with elevated TFS as the dependent variable and abdominal pain, fatigue, myalgia and arthralgia (possible symptoms of haemochromatosis) as independent variables. This model showed a virtually identical association of elevated TFS with fatigue (PR 1.9; 1.2 to 2.8), but no significant associations with abdominal pain, myalgia or arthralgia. Exclusion of non-white subjects did not substantially change these associations.

Discussion

The current study presents the first data on prevalence and associated factors of liver diseases in a large sample of patients admitted to the emergency room of a European university hospital. The prevalence of anti-HBc and anti-HCV was 6.7% and 2.7%, respectively. Factors independently associated with positive anti-HBc were IVDA, foreign country of birth, non-white ethnicity and high age. Positive anti-HCV was associated with IVDA, blood transfusion and chronic abdominal pain. Patients demonstrated poor awareness and knowledge of liver disease. Transferrin saturation was elevated in 3.3% and was associated with chronic fatigue.

The obtained data from a large sample of patients admitted to the ER were essentially complete, plausible, and generally in accordance with previously available information, supporting the overall validity of our study. The current study also had important limitations: first, we studied only 14.9% of our target population, and the possibility of a recruitment bias has to be addressed. Therefore, we obtained demographic and admission characteristics on all patients admitted to the ER during the study period, and a comparison with this information demonstrated that our study population can be considered as a reasonably representative sample of the target population with regard to these variables, and allowed us to standardise prevalence estimates. Second, we were not able to perform additional laboratory tests of interest including HBsAg, anti-HBs, and confirmatory secondary testing in all anti-HCV positive patients. However, like in other studies, the primary aim of our study was to determine past infection with HBV and HCV. Also, further confirmatory testing was done in a small sample of anti-HCV positive patients, and the observed predictive value positive of 95% suggests that among the 135 anti-HCV positive patients 129 had a previous HCV infection. Assuming a 94% sensitivity of the study's enzyme immunoassay [8], about 137 patients in the tested population would then have had a previous HCV infection, which is very similar to the number without these corrections. And although HCV-RNA was not determined in all patients, one can expect that approximately 90% of infected patients had a chronic infection [9]. Third, we were not able to do genotyping for mutations associated with haemochromatosis. Finally, the observed associations are descriptive, and do not allow causal inferences.

Several studies from different countries have reported prevalence estimates of viral hepatitis in selected or more general populations as e.g. in the Italian Dionysos study [10]. However the only previous study from a developed country that determined the prevalence of viral hepatitis in an emergency room population was conducted in Baltimore, USA in the early 1990s, i.e. before the introduction of widespread HBV vaccination programs [5]. There, the prevalence was 5% for HBsAg, indicating active and not previous HBV infection, and 18% for anti-HCV. In the general Swiss population an estimated 3% have been infected with HBV [11, 12], and 0.75% with HCV [13]. Our results therefore indicate that the prevalence of previous infection is about twice as high for HBV and three times higher for HCV compared to the general population. Possible explanations for the higher prevalence are medical conditions associated with viral hepatitis that lead to ER admission and overrepresentation of high-risk groups such as intravenous drug users, patients not enrolled in regular health plans and a primarily urban population. Amongst intravenous drug users, anti-HBc prevalence was 42% compared to 60–80% amongst other Swiss IVDA cohorts in the 1980s and 20% in the early 1990s [14, 15]. The higher prevalence of previous HBV infection in immigrants is in accordance with frequent perinatal transmission in countries with high endemicity, and with results from a previous Swiss study in pregnant women [12]. 60% of intravenous drug users were anti-HCV positive, which is similar to the results of two Swiss studies published in 1990 and 2000 in IVDA cohorts [16, 17].

The decreasing prevalence of HBV infections in intravenous drug users demonstrates the success of HBV vaccination programs that target this high-risk group, and immunization of all adolescents (implemented in Switzerland in 1998), is expected to be eventually highly efficacious in reducing HBV infections in the general population. However it will require decades until these measures will reduce the population burden of HBV infection, and adults at high risk including immigrants are difficult to reach through national vaccination programs and public health campaigns. Particularly this high-risk subpopulation is well represented in ER departments. Further, 74% of the anti-HCV positive patients admitted to the ER were less than 60 years old, which is of particular relevance since treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin should be instituted in patients at risk for late complications at a young age. Based on a chronic course in approximately 10% of anti-HBc and 70–80% of anti-HCV positive patients, about 130 patients with chronic HBV infection and 350–400 patients with chronic HCV infection are seen in the studied ER population during one year. However 42% had not been vaccinated against HBV, 33% did not know whether they had been vaccinated, only less than half of all anti-HCV positive patients knew about their infection, and half of all anti-HCV positive patients reported regular alcohol consumption, which is strongly discouraged as it promotes HCV-related fibrogenesis [18]. Therefore our results indicate that intense efforts to diagnose viral hepatitis and educate patients in ER have the potential to prevent new infections and treat complications.

Elevated TFS is an important marker of disease in C282Y homozygote patients, who account for about 90% of all clinical cases of haemochromatosis [19, 20]. Although the prevalence of this mutation is known to be about 0.4 to 0.5% in Caucasian populations [4, 21], until recently there has been few data on the penetrance of C282Y in the general population, which is critically important for the controversial discussion on the utility of population screening [22]. In a large international study Adams et al. reported a prevalence of 0.44% for C282Y homozygotes in a white primary care population, and amongst those TFS was >50% in 84% of men and >45% in 73% of women [21]. Based on this data we would expect 20 C282Y homozygous amongst 4'616 white patients (60% men) in our study population, and 16 of them with elevated TFS as defined above. We identified 151 patients with such an elevated TFS amongst 4'616 white patients (3.3%), which allows us to estimate a specificity of 97% and a positive predictive value of 11% regarding the identification of C282Y homozygote patients with elevated TFS in our study population. This implies that 89% of patients with an elevated TFS in white patients of our study population were not C282Y homozygote and therefore limits the power and specificity of our results with regard to haemochromatosis. Other studies in primary care populations were able to identify patients with C282Y homozygosity through genetic screening and reported an association with liver diseases. However, they also failed to observe an association between C282Y homozygosity with elevated TFS and the rather non-specific symptoms of haemochromatosis that are highly prevalent in such a population [21, 23, 24]. Further, our study had the advantage that patients with high alcohol consumption and HCV infection could be excluded in a subanalysis, and the higher prevalence of fatigue in patients with elevated TFS even within this restricted population may indicate the presence of other chronic liver diseases including haemochromatosis and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.

Recent data suggest that even amongst C282Y homozygotes with elevated TFS only a minority will develop frank clinical haemochromatosis, and consequently no clear indication for population-based screening for haemochromatosis has been established [22, 24]. Nevertheless, increased TFS is a useful sign of chronic liver disease including haemochromatosis and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, and our results confirm that chronic fatigue is a possible symptom of increased TFS and chronic liver disease.

Conclusion

We conclude that emergency rooms should be considered as targets for public health programs that encourage vaccination, patient education and screening of high-risk patients for liver disease with subsequent referral for treatment if indicated. Future studies may compare our results with the epidemiology of liver disease in emergency rooms in other hospitals and countries, and evaluate the effect of preventive measures.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The study was funded by an unrestricted educational grant from Essex/Schering-Plough Corporation to JR. Laboratory analyses were funded by a special research grant from the University Hospital Berne to HZ. SR was supported by a Merck Sharp & Dohme International Fellowship in Clinical Pharmacology during the data analysis and writing of the manuscript. EAD was supported by a Preisig scholarship for doctoral students from the foundation for liver diseases, Berne (Stiftung für Leberkrankheiten). The funding had no effect on the content of the manuscript or the decision to submit it for publication.

The authors greatly appreciate the contributions regarding patient recruitment and data collection of the staff of the Clinical Investigation Unit and of the Emergency Room of the University Hospital Berne. We thank the staff of the Hospital's electronic patient data division for providing files on the source population. We also thank James A. Kaye at Boston University for his helpful comments on statistical methods and the final draft of the paper.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Berne
(2)
Clinical Investigation Unit, University Hospital Berne
(3)
Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health
(4)
Institute of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital Berne
(5)
Emergency Department, University Hospital Berne
(6)
Division of Hepatology, University Hospital Berne

References

  1. EASL International Consensus Conference on Hepatitis B. 13-14 September, 2002: Geneva, Switzerland. Consensus statement (short version). J Hepatol. 2003, 38 (4): 533-540. 10.1016/S0168-8278(03)00083-7.
  2. Alter MJ: Epidemiology of hepatitis B in Europe and worldwide. J Hepatol. 2003, 39 Suppl 1: S64-9. 10.1016/S0168-8278(03)00141-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Shepard CW, Finelli L, Alter MJ: Global epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005, 5 (9): 558-567. 10.1016/S1473-3099(05)70216-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Merryweather-Clarke AT, Pointon JJ, Shearman JD, Robson KJ: Global prevalence of putative haemochromatosis mutations. J Med Genet. 1997, 34 (4): 275-278.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Kelen GD, Green GB, Purcell RH, Chan DW, Qaqish BF, Sivertson KT, Quinn TC: Hepatitis B and hepatitis C in emergency department patients. N Engl J Med. 1992, 326 (21): 1399-1404.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Mantel N, Haenszel WH: Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959, 22: 719-748.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Barros AJ, Hirakata VN: Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003, 3: 21-10.1186/1471-2288-3-21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Chapko MK, Sloan KL, Davison JW, Dufour DR, Bankson DD, Rigsby M, Dominitz JA: Cost effectiveness of testing strategies for chronic hepatitis C. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005, 100 (3): 607-615. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.40531.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Seeff LB, Miller RN, Rabkin CS, Buskell-Bales Z, Straley-Eason KD, Smoak BL, Johnson LD, Lee SR, Kaplan EL: 45-year follow-up of hepatitis C virus infection in healthy young adults. Ann Intern Med. 2000, 132 (2): 105-111.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bellentani S, Tiribelli C, Saccoccio G, Sodde M, Fratti N, De Martin C, Cristianini G: Prevalence of chronic liver disease in the general population of northern Italy: the Dionysos Study. Hepatology. 1994, 20 (6): 1442-1449.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kammerlander R, Zimmermann H: [Epidemiology of hepatitis B in Switzerland]. Soz Praventivmed. 1998, 43 Suppl 1: S27-30, S101-4. 10.1007/BF02042170.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bart PA, Jacquier P, Zuber PL, Lavanchy D, Frei PC: Seroprevalence of HBV (anti-HBc, HBsAg and anti-HBs) and HDV infections among 9006 women at delivery. Liver. 1996, 16 (2): 110-116.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Grob PJ, Negro F, Renner EL: [Hepatitis C virus infection. Overview. SEVHEP (Swiss Experts on Viral Hepatitis)]. Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax. 2000, 89 (40): 1587-1604.Google Scholar
  14. Broers B, Junet C, Bourquin M, Deglon JJ, Perrin L, Hirschel B: Prevalence and incidence rate of HIV, hepatitis B and C among drug users on methadone maintenance treatment in Geneva between 1988 and 1995. Aids. 1998, 12 (15): 2059-2066. 10.1097/00002030-199815000-00018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Rohrig S, Grob PJ: [Infection with hepatitis viruses HAV, HBV and HCV as well as with AIDS virus HIV in drug addicts of the Zurich street scene--a prevalence study]. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1990, 120 (17): 621-629.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Somaini B, Wang J, Perozo M, Kuhn F, Meili D, Grob P, Flepp M: A continuing concern: HIV and hepatitis testing and prevalence among drug users in substitution programmes in Zurich, Switzerland. AIDS Care. 2000, 12 (4): 449-460. 10.1080/09540120050123855.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Steffen T, Blattler R, Gutzwiller F, Zwahlen M: HIV and hepatitis virus infections among injecting drug users in a medically controlled heroin prescription programme. Eur J Public Health. 2001, 11 (4): 425-430. 10.1093/eurpub/11.4.425.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Poynard T, Bedossa P, Opolon P: Natural history of liver fibrosis progression in patients with chronic hepatitis C. The OBSVIRC, METAVIR, CLINIVIR, and DOSVIRC groups. Lancet. 1997, 349 (9055): 825-832. 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07642-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. A simple genetic test identifies 90% of UK patients with haemochromatosis. The UK Haemochromatosis Consortium. Gut. 1997, 41 (6): 841-844.
  20. Himmelmann A, Bortoluzzi L, Jansen S, Fehr J: [Frequency of HFE gene mutations and genotype-phenotype correlations in patients with hereditary hemochromatosis in Switzerland]. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 2000, 130 (31-32): 1112-1119.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Adams PC, Reboussin DM, Barton JC, McLaren CE, Eckfeldt JH, McLaren GD, Dawkins FW, Acton RT, Harris EL, Gordeuk VR, Leiendecker-Foster C, Speechley M, Snively BM, Holup JL, Thomson E, Sholinsky P: Hemochromatosis and iron-overload screening in a racially diverse population. N Engl J Med. 2005, 352 (17): 1769-1778. 10.1056/NEJMoa041534.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Schmitt B, Golub RM, Green R: Screening primary care patients for hereditary hemochromatosis with transferrin saturation and serum ferritin level: systematic review for the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2005, 143 (7): 522-536.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Waalen J, Felitti V, Gelbart T, Ho NJ, Beutler E: Penetrance of hemochromatosis. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2002, 29 (3): 418-432. 10.1006/bcmd.2002.0596.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Beutler E, Felitti VJ, Koziol JA, Ho NJ, Gelbart T: Penetrance of 845G--> A (C282Y) HFE hereditary haemochromatosis mutation in the USA. Lancet. 2002, 359 (9302): 211-218. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07447-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-230X/7/5/prepub

Copyright

© Russmann et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement