Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Hepatobiliary cystadenocarcinoma without mesenchymal stroma in a female patient: a case report

  • Yang-Hong Dai1,
  • Yee Hui Yeo2, 3,
  • Yao-Feng Li4,
  • Chung-Bao Hsieh5 and
  • Yu-Lueng Shih6Email author
BMC Gastroenterology201414:109

DOI: 10.1186/1471-230X-14-109

Received: 9 October 2013

Accepted: 12 June 2014

Published: 16 June 2014



Hepatobiliary cystadenocarcinoma is a rare epithelial malignant neoplasm of the liver or extrahepatic bile ducts. Early diagnosis of hepatobiliary cystadenocarcinoma is difficult because of its asymptomatic features and rarity. Moreover, the molecular pathogenesis of hepatobiliary cystadenocarcinoma remains unclear. Herein, we described a case of hepatobiliary cystadenocarcinoma in female with chronic hepatitis B and repeated hepatolithiasis.

Case presentation

A 65-year-old woman with medical history of latent hepatitis B virus infection, repeated choledocholisthiasis, and cholecystitis was admitted due to a heterogeneous cystic mass (5.6 cm × 4 cm) shown on abdominal ultrasonography during regular physical checkup. The patient complained about irregular bowel movements with intermittent diarrhea for two months before presentation. Computed tomography (CT) disclosed a multiloculated cystic lesion in the left hepatic lobe with the presence of intraductal stones and dilatation of intrahepatic ducts. Histological results obtained from left lobectomy specimens showed hepatobiliary cystadenocarcinoma without accompanied mesenchymal stroma.


Notably, hepatobiliary cystadenocarcinoma without mesenchymal stroma seldom occurs in women and is usually associated with poor prognosis. We present the rare findings in this patient and suggest that chronic inflammatory insults in the intrahepatic bile ducts might shed light on the cystadenocarcinogenesis.


Hepatobiliary cystadenocarcinoma Biliary tumors Hepatolithiasis Cholestasis


Hepatobiliary cystadenocarcinoma is a rare cystic neoplasm that predominantly occurs in the middle-aged women. Its early detection is challenging because of varied clinical features [1]. The tumor may originate from pre-existing cystadenoma or from other benign cystic lesions. However, it can also develop “de novo” from the biliary epithelium or peribiliary glands [2]. The two subgroups, cystadenocarcinoma with mesenchymal stroma and without stroma may yield different clinical outcomes [3]. The presence of mesenchymal stroma that resembles ovarian stroma (OS) suggests the possible etiology during embryonic development and its female preponderance [4]. In the context of OS, cystadenoma is usually the prerequisite for cystadenocarcinoma. On the contrary, the mechanisms of cystadenocarcinogenesis for subtype without OS remains unclear. Chronic inflammation stimulated by hepatolithiasis may play a significant role in driving the malignant transformation of cholangiocarcinoma [5] and intraductal papillary neoplasia of the liver [6]. We suspect that this may also associate with the carcinogenesis of hepatobiliary cystadenocarcinoma. We report here on a case of a hepatobiliary cystadenocarcinoma without mesenchymal stroma and discuss the involvement of chronic inflammatory assailants caused by hepatholithiasis, chronic HBV infection, and surgical intervention.

Case presentation

A 65-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital for surgical intervention due to one liver tumor identified on the abdominal ultrasonography during regular follow-up for chronic hepatitis B. Before presentation, the patient reported to have irregular bowel movement with loose stool passage and weight gain for about two months. She experienced no abdominal pain, fullness or vomiting. When tracing her past history, the patient had undergone cholecystectomy for cholecystitis and received two times of laparotomy in regard to repeated choledocholisthiasis caused by hepatolithiasis about 30 and 20 years ago, respectively. Besides, four of the patient’s seven siblings were diagnosed with hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma, which had contributed to their death and severe morbidity.

The physical examination was unremarkable. There was no abdominal tenderness, rebounding tenderness and abnormal bowel sounds. Murphy’s sign was also negative. Laboratory studies on admission yield normal blood biochemistry and mild thrombocytopenia (127000 per cubic millimeter). The liver function test showed normal results (AST = 19 U/L, ALT = 16 U/L). No prolonged prothrombin times or partial-thromboplastin times was found. Direct and total bilirubin were not elevated. Enzymes such as gamma-glutamyl transferase or alkaline phosphatase were within normal ranges. The urinalysis was normal, without dark or tea-colored urine. The levels of tumor markers such as AFP, CEA, CA125 and CA19-9 were all within normal limits.Ultrasonography (Figure 1) disclosed a heterogeneous cystic lesion about 7.6 cm × 5.5 cm over the lateral segment of left hepatic lobe with dilatation of intrahepatic ducts. Computed tomography (CT) of abdomen demonstrated multiloculated cystic tumor with internal septa in the left lobe of the liver (Figure 2). In addition, non-calcified stones were found in dilated intrahepatic bile duct and common bile duct. Under the impression of cholangiocarcinoma, left lobectomy of liver and choledocholithotomy were performed. The cystic tumor was smoothly removed with clear margin. Grossly, the resected tumor demonstrated multi-cystic and ill-defined appearance beneath the liver capsule (Figure 3). All sections were embedded and examined. Microscopically, a cyst lined by proliferating epithelia composed of papillary proliferation of dysplastic cells with mucin hypersecretion was identified (Figure 4A). It was supported by fibromuscular structure where ovary-like stroma was not seen. Furthermore, malignant picture with deregulated growth pattern and perineural invasion was demonstrated in some regions (Figure 4B). The cystic tumor was finally diagnosed as a hepatobiliary cystadenocarcinoma without mesenchymal stroma (pT1N0M0).
Figure 1

Abdominal ultrasonography. Abdominal ultrasonography (US) showed a multiloculated cystic mass over the lateral segment of left hepatic lobe.
Figure 2

Computed tomography of the liver and bile duct. (A) Computed tomography (CT) disclosed multiloculated cystic lesion with internal septa (arrow). (B) Gallbladder stone was identified (arrow). (C) After the administration of contrast medium, there was enhancement delineating the contour of the cystic tumor (arrow). (D) The cystic lesion extended to the lateral division of the left hepatic lobe (arrow).
Figure 3

Gross section of the cystic tumor. The resected mass showed solitary, multi-cystic and ill-defined appearance with about 0.1 cm of distance beneath the liver capsule.
Figure 4

Pathological findings from the resected lesion. (A) Photograph of the pathologic specimen shows well-differentiated biliary cystadenocarcinoma characterized by columnar cells arranged in papillary structures (original magnification × 100). Note that there is no ovarian stroma present. (B) Perineural invasion of the tumor cells is observed in some parts of the tumor (hematoxylin & eosin staining, original magnification × 200).

After total resection of the tumor, the patient was hospitalized for several days. She had no fever, no distention and other morbidities before discharge. Her incision had healed well 3 weeks after discharge. She showed no adverse event related to hepatobiliary disease or the surgery. The follow up MRI three years after operation confirmed no recurrence of malignancy.


Hepatobiliary cystadenocarcinoma is a rare cystic neoplasm that usually presents as a multilocular cystic mass with internal septations, nodules, and irregular, thickened cyst wall [1, 7, 8]. It may occur at any age with females affected more than males. Though the exact etiology remains uncertain, it has been proposed that the majority of these tumors come from a pre-existing cystadenoma or benign bile duct cysts [2, 9]. In addition, some studies suggested that the cystic adenocarcinomas are the cystic variants of cholangiocarcinoma with shared biliary phenotypes [1]. This makes the clinicopathological features more varied than its counterpart, cystadenomas alone. The cystic tumors in females that frequently present ovarian-like stroma (OS) are not observed in male cases [1]. It may be due to the proximity between liver and gonads during embryonic development and tissue migration [4], which can explain why cystadenoma and cystadenocarcinoma with OS exclusively occurs in women. In addition, the expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors in the stromal cells also demonstrates the female predominance in the disease series [10]. CA 19–9, a marker that is elevated in gastrointestinal cancer and bile duct diseases, has been previously reported to be elevated in hepatobiliary cystadenocarcinoma with OS [11] but within normal range in its counterpart without OS [12]. This is manifested in the present case, which further implies the difference between these two subtypes. Clinically, the presence of mesenchymal stroma that resembles OS indicates a relatively indolent course and a better prognosis [3]. However, the malignant potential of this subtype engender the necessity for total resection. On the contrary, cystadenocarcinomas without mesenchymal stroma occur in both genders and present worse outcomes. Two larger studies revealed the survival rate of cystadenocarcinomas without OS is not more than 50% [1, 2]. In our case, however, the patient who presents hepatobiliary cystadenocarcinoma without OS remains in healthy status three years after surgery.

There is currently little evidence describing the genesis of cystadenocarcinoma without OS. More clinical and pathological studies are required to determine whether it is generated directly from biliary epithelium or from other pre-malignant structures. One possible mechanism of the initial cystic formation comes from the hyperplasia of peribiliary glands which are located along the walls of extrahepatic ducts, the neck of the gallbladder and the larger intrahepatic bile ducts [13, 14]. These glands are proposed to serve as source of stem cells for biliary epithelia regeneration under normal condition and in response to injury [14]. Therefore, it is reasonable to deduce that pathological insults to these glands may instigate a variety of disorders including cancer. In support of this, hepatobiliary diseases such as cirrhosis, cholangitis and hepatolithiasis are correlated with the hyperplasia of peribiliary glands [1, 5, 15]. In the present case, multiple insults including surgeries [16] due to hepatolithiasis, chronic HBV infection, and IHD stones may synergistically irritate peribiliary glands thereby causing progressively pathological changes and poses risk for malignant changes. In recent years, an entity named intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) has been recognized as a unique neoplasm arising from intrahepatic biliary tree [17]. It is characterized by solitary and diffuse growth of biliary epithelia into the bile ducts with a papillary pattern. Hepatholithiasis has been suggested to initiate the genesis of IPMN [18]. Chen et al. [6] reported that chronic inflammation in the context of hepatolithiasis causes papillary growth of the biliary epithelia with subsequent metaplasia and invasive carcinoma. Intrahepatic duct stone and intracystic stone formation has been reported to involve in biliary cystadenoma or cystadenocarcinoma [19, 20]. Importantly, Tseng reported a case of biliary cystadenocarcinoma featured by hepatholithiasis and bilateral IHD and CBD stones, which might also contribute to a microenvironment of chronic inflammation [21]. Collectively, these findings converge on the conclusion that chronic stimulation of bile materials and calculi may exert negative influence and thereby cause a variety of hepatobiliary disorders.

In addition to the presence of calculi in hepatolithiasis, cholestasis is the common phenomenon of cirrhosis, cholangitis and bile duct cysts. To prove the effect of cholestasis on the biliary epithelium, Yang and colleagues [22] induced cholestasis in mouse with chemicals such as carbon tetrachloride or dimethylnitrosamine (DMN) and bile duct ligation (BDL). These approaches accelerated progression of cholangiocarcinoma through down-regulation of miR-34a and let-7a as well as up-regulation of Lin-28B. Of particular note, the up-regulation of Lin-28B is associated with the development of cystic hyperplasia of intrahepatic bile ducts. Moreover, atypical cystic hyperplasia was induced by cholestasis in the progression of cholangiocarcinoma. Taken together, the correlation between the cystic variant of cholangiocarcinoma and cystadenocarcinoma seems to lie in the cholestasis-mediated cystic formation. The authors suggest that cystadenocarcinoma could be caused by cholestasis based on the similar mechanisms.

To avoid development of biliary tract malignancies due to surgical intervention, anatomic hepatectomy [23] and laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy [24] could be performed to treat hepatolithiasis.


In conclusion, we strongly suspect that hepatolithiasis and other inflammatory changes contribute to the formation of the patient’s hepatobiliary cystadenocarcinoma, probably through hyperplasia and neoplasia of peribiliary glands and biliary epithelia. It is a possible etiology other than benign cystic lesion or ectopic ovarian tissue during embryonic development, and the absence of ovarian stroma also lowers the possibility of tumorigenesis from pre-existing cystadenoma. Furthermore, since the absence of OS has poorer clinical outcomes, early detection and complete resection of this tumor are the key factors for achieving cure. Regular ultrasonography checkup is warranted for patient with evidence of hepatholithiasis and associated dilatation of intrahepatic ducts for early diagnosis of this malignant disease.


Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journal.


Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital
Department of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center
Department of Medical Education and Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital
Department of Pathology, Tri-Service General Hospital
Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center


  1. Devaney K, Goodman ZD, Ishak KG: Hepatobiliary cystadenoma and cystadenocarcinoma. A light microscopic and immunohistochemical study of 70 patients. Am J Surg Pathol. 1994, 18 (11): 1078-1091. 10.1097/00000478-199411000-00002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Wheeler DA, Edmondson HA: Cystadenoma with mesenchymal stroma (CMS) in the liver and bile ducts. A clinicopathologic study of 17 cases, 4 with malignant change. Cancer. 1985, 56 (6): 1434-1445. 10.1002/1097-0142(19850915)56:6<1434::AID-CNCR2820560635>3.0.CO;2-F.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Akwari OE, Tucker A, Seigler HF, Itani KM: Hepatobiliary cystadenoma with mesenchymal stroma. Ann Surg. 1990, 211 (1): 18-27. 10.1097/00000658-199001000-00004.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Erdogan D, Kloek J, Lamers WH, Offerhaus GJ, Busch OR, Gouma DJ, van Gulik TM: Mucinous cystadenomas in liver: management and origin. Dig Surg. 2010, 27 (1): 19-23. 10.1159/000268110.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Nakanuma Y, Terada T, Tanaka Y, Ohta G: Are hepatolithiasis and cholangiocarcinoma aetiologically related? A morphological study of 12 cases of hepatolithiasis associated with cholangiocarcinoma. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol. 1985, 406 (1): 45-58. 10.1007/BF00710556.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen TC, Nakanuma Y, Zen Y, Chen MF, Jan YY, Yeh TS, Chiu CT, Kuo TT, Kamiya J, Oda K, Hamaguchi M, Ohno Y, Hsieh LL, Nimura Y: Intraductal papillary neoplasia of the liver associated with hepatolithiasis. Hepatology. 2001, 34 (4 Pt 1): 651-658.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Erdogan D, Busch OR, Rauws EA, van Delden OM, Gouma DJ, van-Gulik TM: Obstructive jaundice due to hepatobiliary cystadenoma or cystadenocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2006, 12 (35): 5735-5738.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Thomas KT, Welch D, Trueblood A, Sulur P, Wise P, Gorden DL, Chari RS, Wright JK, Washington K, Pinson CW: Effective treatment of biliary cystadenoma. Ann Surg. 2005, 241 (5): 769-773. 10.1097/01.sla.0000161982.57360.1b. discussion 773–765View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Kubota E, Katsumi K, Iida M, Kishimoto A, Ban Y, Nakata K, Takahashi N, Kobayashi K, Andoh K, Takamatsu S, Joh T: Biliary cystadenocarcinoma followed up as benign cystadenoma for 10 years. J Gastroenterol. 2003, 38 (3): 278-282. 10.1007/s005350300048.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Weihing RR, Shintaku IP, Geller SA, Petrovic LM: Hepatobiliary and pancreatic mucinous cystadenocarcinomas with mesenchymal stroma: analysis of estrogen receptors/progesterone receptors and expression of tumor-associated antigens. Mod Pathol. 1997, 10 (4): 372-379.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Thomas JA, Scriven MW, Puntis MC, Jasani B, Williams GT: Elevated serum CA 19–9 levels in hepatobiliary cystadenoma with mesenchymal stroma. Two case reports with immunohistochemical confirmation. Cancer. 1992, 70 (7): 1841-1846. 10.1002/1097-0142(19921001)70:7<1841::AID-CNCR2820700706>3.0.CO;2-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Horsmans Y, Laka A, van Beers BE, Descamps C, Gigot JF, Geubel AP: Hepatobiliary cystadenocarcinoma without ovarian stroma and normal CA 19–9 levels. Unusually prolonged evolution. Dig Dis Sci. 1997, 42 (7): 1406-1408. 10.1023/A:1018842021677.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Nakanuma Y, Katayanagi K, Terada T, Saito K: Intrahepatic peribiliary glands of humans. I. Anatomy, development and presumed functions. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1994, 9 (1): 75-79. 10.1111/j.1440-1746.1994.tb01220.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cardinale V, Wang Y, Carpino G, Mendel G, Alpini G, Gaudio E, Reid LM, Alvaro D: The biliary tree–a reservoir of multipotent stem cells. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012, 9 (4): 231-240. 10.1038/nrgastro.2012.23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Wee A, Ludwig J, Coffey RJ, LaRusso NF, Wiesner RH: Hepatobiliary carcinoma associated with primary sclerosing cholangitis and chronic ulcerative colitis. Hum Pathol. 1985, 16 (7): 719-726. 10.1016/S0046-8177(85)80158-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Tocchi A, Mazzoni G, Liotta G, Lepre L, Cassini D, Miccini M: Late development of bile duct cancer in patients who had biliary-enteric drainage for benign disease: a follow-up study of more than 1,000 patients. Ann Surg. 2001, 234 (2): 210-214. 10.1097/00000658-200108000-00011.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Barton JG, Barrett DA, Maricevich MA, Schnelldorfer T, Wood CM, Smyrk TC, Baron TH, Sarr MG, Donohue JH, Farnell MB, Kendrick ML, Nagorney DM, Reid Lombardo KM, Que FG: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the biliary tract: a real disease?. HPB (Oxford). 2009, 11 (8): 684-691. 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00122.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Yeh TS, Tseng JH, Chiu CT, Liu NJ, Chen TC, Jan YY, Chen MF: Cholangiographic spectrum of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the bile ducts. Ann Surg. 2006, 244 (2): 248-253. 10.1097/01.sla.0000217636.40050.54.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang YJ, Lee SD, Lai KH, Wang SS, Lo KJ: Primary biliary cystic tumors of the liver. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993, 88 (4): 599-603.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lei S, Domenico DR, Howard JM: Intrahepatic biliary cystadenoma with intracystic gallstone formation. HPB Surg. 1994, 7 (3): 241-247. 10.1155/1994/62393. discussion 247–249View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Tseng CA, Pan YS, Chen CY, Liu CS, Wu DC, Wang WM, Jan CM: Biliary cystadenocarcinoma associated with atrophy of the left hepatic lobe and hepatolithiasis mimicking intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a case report. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2004, 20 (4): 198-203. 10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70107-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Yang H, Li TW, Peng J, Tang X, Ko KS, Xia M, Aller MA: A mouse model of cholestasis-associated cholangiocarcinoma and transcription factors involved in progression. Gastroenterology. 2011, 141 (1): 378-388. 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.03.044. 388 e371–374View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Jarufe N, Figueroa E, Munoz C, Moisan F, Varas J, Valbuena JR, Bambs C, Martinez J, Pimentel F: Anatomic hepatectomy as a definitive treatment for hepatolithiasis: a cohort study. HPB (Oxford). 2012, 14 (9): 604-610. 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00488.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Machado MA, Makdissi FF, Surjan RC, Teixeira AR, Sepulveda A, Bacchella T, Machado MC: Laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy for hepatolithiasis. Surg Endosc. 2008, 22 (1): 245-10.1007/s00464-007-9666-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:


© Dai et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.