Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Applicability of a short/rapid 13C-urea breath test for Helicobacter pylori: retrospective multicenter chart review study

  • Hemda Schmilovitz-Weiss1Email author,
  • Vered Sehayek-Shabat1,
  • Rami Eliakim2,
  • Eitan Skapa3,
  • Yona Avni4 and
  • Haim Shirin3
BMC Gastroenterology201212:8

DOI: 10.1186/1471-230X-12-8

Received: 12 March 2011

Accepted: 19 January 2012

Published: 19 January 2012

Abstract

Background

Carbon labeled urea breath tests usually entail a two point sampling with a 20 to 30-minute gap. Our aim was to evaluate the duration of time needed for diagnosing Helicobacter pylori by the BreathID® System.

Methods

This is a retrospective multicenter chart review study. Test location, date, delta over baseline, and duration of the entire test were recorded. Consecutively 13C urea breath tests results were extracted from the files over a nine year period.

Results

Of the 12,791 tests results, 35.1% were positively diagnosed and only 0.1% were inconclusive. A statistically significant difference in prevalence among the countries was found: Germany showing the lowest, 13.3%, and Israel the highest, 44.1%. Significant differences were found in time to diagnosis: a positive diagnosis had the shortest and an inconclusive result had the longest. Overall test duration averaged 15.1 minutes in Germany versus approximately 13 minutes in other countries. Diagnosis was achieved after approximately 9 minutes in Israel, Italy and Switzerland, but after 10 on average in the others. The mean delta over baseline value for a negative diagnosis was 1.03 ± 0.86, (range, 0.9 - 5), versus 20.2 ± 18.9, (range, 5.1 - 159.4) for a positive one.

Conclusions

The BreathID® System used in diagnosing Helicobacter pylori can safely shorten test duration on average of 10-13 minutes without any loss of sensitivity or specificity and with no test lasting more than 21 minutes.

Keywords

BreathID® breath test Helicobacter pylori test duration

Background

Among the non-endoscopic procedures used in diagnosing Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), serology remains the most accepted. It is a widely available, inexpensive test with a high negative predictive value. However, the variable specificity, especially if the prevalence of H. pylori is low, and its relatively poor positive predictive value, limit the use of the test. Carbon labeled urea breath tests (UBT), which have a high sensitivity and specificity, are commonly used as a noninvasive method in detecting an active Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. UBT are the preferred method used in epidemiological studies, screening dyspeptic patients and assessing eradication or recurrence of the infection [1]. These tests usually entail a two point sampling with a 20 to 30-minute gap, and necessitate a mass spectrometry for analysis. Upon modifying the sampling method, immediate results can be achieved.

One such option includes real time continuous sampling 13C molecular correlation spectroscopy (MCS™) technology. The BreathID® device (Exalenz, Israel) has been validated and cleared by the FDA and has also been previously used on children and adults [2, 3]. This office-based system offers several advantages over the conventional mass spectrometry-based UBT, including an immediate test result, a standardized test drink (citric acid) and, most importantly for children, a sampling method that does not require active cooperation.

For many years, test shortening procedures have been routinely practiced including the use of various 13C-urea concentrations, and different citric acid test drinks. The new molecular correlation spectrometry technology enables continuous sampling of the expired breath of the patients, which in turn, enables the device to terminate the test immediately after a conclusive positive or negative result of H. pylori had been identified [2].

The use of a citric acid-based test drink has been shown to enhance hydrolysis of the urea and produce a more rapid rise in expired 13CO2 [4]. The BreathID™system combined with a citric acid drink and continuous breath sampling significantly reduces the amount of time needed for a final result compared to isotope ratio mass spectrometer. However, these test-shortening modifications have not been widely accepted by the medical community. There are limited data [5] validating these tests but they have been in use in several gastroenterology departments for many years.

The current investigation retrospectively examined over 12,000 BreathID™ test results from several randomly selected gastroenterology departments. The goal of this retrospective evaluation was to assess, on average, the minimal time required to achieve accurate, definite UBT results using the BreathID™ system.

Methods

Urea Breath Tests

The effect of the breath test sampling method in detecting H. pylori was examined using continuous real time methodology (i.e., the BreathID® system). The BreathID™ system is comprised of the following components: a) a kit containing 75 mg of 13C-urea (a 99% 13C-enriched urea tablet); b) a packet of granulated Citrica (a 4.5 gram packet containing 4 g of citric acid, 0.149 mg of aspartame, orange aroma, FD&C yellow #6); c) an IDcircuit-sampling device; and d) a BreathID® device. All patients received 75 mg of 13C-urea with a 4.5 gram citric acid based powder (Citrica). The IDcircuit, a continuous nasal breath sampling device, transported the breath sample from the patient to the BreathID™ and did not require active cooperation.

Based on molecular correlation spectrometry, the BreathID® continuously measured 13CO2 and 12CO2 concentrations from the patient's breath, thus establishing the 13CO2/12CO2 ratio, displayed vs. time on the screen. The results were obtained within 10-15 minutes and printed on a thermal printer.

Determining the positive or negative results from the BreathID™ was based on a device algorithm. If, after 5 minutes, the delta over baseline (DOB) of the 13CO2/12CO2 ratio was greater than 6 at more than two time points, the patient was considered positive. If, after 5 minutes, the DOB was below 3 at more than two time points, the patient was considered negative. If, after 20 minutes, neither of the two criteria was fulfilled, then the nominal 5 DOB threshold was considered in order to distinguish positive from negative patients, unless the previous three points were within ± 1 DOB of the 5 DOB threshold. In this case, the results were defined as inconclusive.

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Rabin Medical Center. Informed consent was not taken from all patients since this is retrospective study with data taken from different centers not all needing informed consent. The study was supported by Exalenz, Ltd.

Study Subjects and Protocol

A total of 12,751 consecutively selected 13C urea breath tests performed between 2001 and 2009 were extracted from the files of fifteen gastrointestinal units in Israel, The Netherlands, Switzerland, Germany and Italy, representing approximately 50% of the tests performed during the 9-year period. Some patients underwent a second UBT test after H. pylori eradication. For subjects who had more than one test result, pre and post treatment, all of the identified tests were used. There was no obvious selection bias, as all tests were collected from these centers. 13C-UBT in the gastroenterology clinical laboratories was used in subjects with gastrointestinal symptoms, such as dyspepsia, peptic ulcers and gastric malignancy. UBT was given to patients after a three-hour fast.

Exclusion criteria included: a) administration of antibiotics and/or bismuth preparations within four weeks prior to date of entry to the study; b) administration of proton pump inhibitors within 2 weeks prior to date of entry to the study; and c) pregnant or breast-feeding women. The challenges were separated into positive (DOB > 5 within 20 minutes) and negative test results (DOB < 5 within 20 minutes). Test date, country, device number, DOB, final result time (time at which the test result was obtained) and duration of the entire test were recorded. In addition, we specifically searched for the number of individuals who had an inconclusive result after 20 minutes (within 1 DOB of the threshold, as described above).

Statistical Analyses

Continuous variables are summarized by mean, standard deviation (SD), minimum, median and maximum and are compared by a t-test (two groups) or ANOVA (3 groups or more). Categorical variables are summarized by a count and percentage and compared by a chi-squared test. Since so few tests were inconclusive, subjects with inconclusive results were excluded from the analyses. In addition, there were 27 test subjects for whom duration of examination was incorrectly recorded due to a software bug. Therefore, these cases were also excluded from analyses of test duration.

Results

Prevalence of H. pylori

The diagnosis distribution was evaluated in all sites within each country. Italy - 7, Israel - 5 and Germany, The Netherlands and Switzerland, with only one site each. All sites had one device per site except for Switzerland, with two.

Study data are presented in Table 1. Out of 12,751 tests performed (Table 1), only 0.1% of the test results were inconclusive. Analysis of the H. pylori prevalence by country revealed a statistically significant difference in prevalence among the countries evaluated in the study. Germany had the lowest prevalence with 13.3% and Israel the highest with 44.1% (Table 2).
Table 1

Distribution of test duration and DOB by diagnosis.

Outcome

N (%)

Distribution

by test

duration

(n = 12,724)*

  

Mean ± SD

(Minutes)

Minimum

(Minutes)

Median

(Minutes)

Maximum

(Minutes)

Inconclusive

8 (0.1)

18.04 ± 1.76

14.68

18.09

20.35

Negative

8254 (64.8)

10.03 ± 2.24

5.43

10.05

20.58

Positive

4462 (35.1)

8.93 ± 2.55

5.42

8.02

20.90

Outcome

N (%)

Distribution

of DOB by

diagnosis

(n = 12751)

  

Mean ± SD

Minimum

Median

Maximum

Inconclusive

8 (0.1)

5.50 ± 0.24

5.20

5.55

5.80

Negative

8268 (64.8)

1.03 ± 0.86

-0.90

1.00

5.00

Positive

4475 (35.1)

20.20 ± 18.89

5.10

13.20

159.4

*(There were 27 tests without duration results, only DOB results (as mentioned in the paper).

Table 2

H. pylori prevalence by country

 

Diagnosis

 

Country

Negative

Positive

All

 

N

%

N

%

 

Germany

169

86.7

26

13.3

195

Netherland

1671

76.0

529

24.0

2200

Israel

3322

55.9

2619

44.1

5941

Italy

2701

70.1

1154

29.9

3855

Switzerland

405

73.4

147

26.6

552

P value*

< 0.0001

*Between countries

Duration of the Testing Procedure

The duration of the test procedure from initiation until completion (overall test duration) and the amount of time required until the device was able to provide a diagnosis (test duration until diagnosis) was compared. We found significant differences in both overall duration and time to diagnosis obtained among the three possible outcomes: positive, negative and inconclusive: a positive diagnosis had the shortest duration and an inconclusive result had the longest duration (Table 1). Significant differences in both overall duration and time to diagnosis between the countries were also found.

Overall, test duration was 15.1 minutes in Germany versus approximately 13 minutes in other countries. This may have been due to the low prevalence of H. pylori in Germany (Table 2) which lead to a longer test duration (Table 3). Diagnosis was obtained after approximately 9 minutes in Israel, Italy and Switzerland, but after 10 minutes in The Netherlands and Germany. Significant differences in both overall duration and time to diagnosis among the sites were also demonstrated, where the shortest mean overall test duration was 12.7 minutes in Italy versus approximately 15 minutes in Israel and Germany. Diagnosis was obtained after approximately 9 minutes in three Israeli sites, one Italian site and a little over 10 minutes on average in The Netherlands, Germany and two Italian sites. Similar results were obtained between devices within their respective countries, which may validate the differences as country- related and not device- related.
Table 3

Distribution by country of total test duration and test duration until diagnosis

    

Test duration (min)

   

Test duration until diagnosis (min)

Test duration by country

N

Mean

SD

Minimum

Median

Maximum

N

Mean

SD

Minimum

Median

Maximum

Country

            

Germany

195

15.10

4.18

10.43

14.48

32.77

195

10.24

2.43

6.68

10.25

20.18

Netherland

2198

13.36

2.97

6.63

12.95

41.40

2198

10.46

2.58

5.42

10.26

20.48

Israel

5918

13.13

3.18

8.18

12.05

47.12

5918

9.23

2.20

5.62

8.25

20.48

Italy

3853

12.97

3.25

8.17

11.68

55.37

3853

9.78

2.47

5.62

8.65

20.90

Switzerland

552

13.80

4.01

8.53

12.94

33.28

552

9.59

2.47

6.12

8.83

20.38

P value

< 0.0001

   

< 0.0001

   

No significant differences were found in overall test duration between tests performed in the morning (until 4 pm) versus tests performed in the afternoon/evening (4 pm or later).

Delta Over Baseline Values (DOB)

Diagnosis, given by the BreathID™ device, was derived by evaluating the DOB value. The mean DOB value for a negative diagnosis was 1.03 (± 0.86) with a range of 0.9 to 5, whereas the positive cases had a mean DOB of 20.2 (± 18.9) and a range of 5.1 through 159.4. Greater variability was seen in DOB means between countries for positively diagnosed subjects than for negative subjects, although this difference was not statistically significant (Table 1).

Discussion

The optimal 13C-UBT conditions for diagnosing H. pylori infection are still being perfected. Attempts to improve the 13C-UBT have focused on decreasing the amount of substrate used and reducing the duration of the test. Urita et al. recently reported an ultra short ten second endoscopic UBT using 20 mg of 13C-urea sprayed onto the gastric mucosa. The maximum sensitivity and specificity of intragastric samples were 83.7% and 100% with a cut-off point of 8 per thousand. However, their clinical cohort cannot be compared with ours because of the use of an invasive endoscopic method [6].

No consensus was demonstrated in the evaluation of different 13C-UBT protocols regarding the dosage of the 13C-urea, the time and interval of the breath sample collection or the test meal chosen to delay gastric emptying. Each clinical center used its own test protocol, making comparison of results almost impossible. Although Dominguez-Munoz et al. reported identical sensitivity and 100% specificity of 13C-UBT for three different test meals (0.1 N citric acid solution, semiliquid fatty meal and semiliquid meal), the delta peak values of 13CO2 were much higher when a citric acid solution was used as the test drink [7]. Moreover, Graham et al. using 1, 2 and 4 g of citric acid reported that the increase in urease activity was dose dependent [8].

In general, acidic gastric milieu may improve the accuracy of the UBT, probably by increasing the entrance of urea into H. pylori and the activity of its cytoplasmic urease, the cornerstone of the urea breath test [912]. Acidic gastric juices may also neutralize the ammonia, which may cause bacterial damage by itself and reduce urease activity [13].

A higher acidic gastric environment (pH approximately 2.0) induced by citric acid has been found by several investigators to increase the exhaled CO2 isotopes (13C or 14C) levels in a dose dependent manner [4, 7, 8]. To maintain a low gastric pH, we used high dose citric acid, which also delays gastric emptying [14]. However, others have hypothesized that these two factors appear unlikely to be the critical determinants in the increased access of urea to the urease enzyme in vivo [1517].

Hamlet et al. more than a decade ago, examined the efficacy and duration of 14C-UBT using similar methods [18, 19]. They reported that by supplying 14C-urea as a rapid -release tablet along with citric acid, it is possible to shorten the duration of the UBT to 10 minutes with excellent accuracy, even during acid suppression therapy. The tablet-based UBT proved to be accurate during omeprazole treatment, correctly identifying all of the 10 H. pylori-infected patients [19].

Chey et al. and our group also demonstrated that intragastric acidification by citrate administration before and during the UBT decreased the false negative results in patients receiving PPI treatment [2022]. The decreased false negative results induced by PPIs are probably related to the use of citric acid as a test drink. Thus, the data reported by Hamlet et al. are consistent with our data.

An acknowledged weakness of our study was the absence of a gold standard to evaluate the performance of the BreathID® system. However, the device was approved by the FDA in 2001, making it a comparable test to endoscopy in diagnosing H. pylori. (The validation trial can be reviewed at link: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf/k011668.pdf).

Since our data is based on raw data from the devices, demographic data is unavailable. The impact of this office- based, fully automated breath collection system, showing immediate results, is that it is activated by a single button, with no need of entering other patient data. Nevertheless, the patient's name/ID can be added to the printout.

Conclusions

The BreathID® test used in our research, performed with a continuous breath test sampling device, collected data from 5 countries over a period of 9 years. Our analysis of 12,791 randomly chosen BreathID™ tests using a high dose citric acid as a test drink and continuous sampling of the expired breath indicated that completion of the UBT required 10-13 minutes on average. Only 8 subjects (0.1%) from the total population had inconclusive results and needed further time to reach a conclusive result. Our results are in agreement with an earlier report using the same technique on a smaller group of examinees [5]. Although this study is retrospective and post hoc in design, our results provide validation of the usefulness of BreathID® as a short and rapid method in diagnosing H. pylori.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Funding

The study was supported by Exalenz Ltd.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Gastroenterology Unit, Hasharon Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Tel-Aviv University
(2)
Department of Gastroenterology, Rambam Medical Center
(3)
Gastroenterology Unit, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Tel-Aviv University
(4)
Gastroenterology Unit, Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Tel-Aviv University

References

  1. Savarino V, Vigneri S, Celle G: The C urea breath test in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Gut. 1999, 45 (SuppI): I18-22.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Shirin H, Kenet G, Shevah O, Wardi Y, Birkenfeld S, Shahmurov M, Bruck R, Niv Y, Moss SF, Avni Y: Evaluation of a novel continuous real time 13C urea breath analyzer for Helicobacter pylori. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001, 15: 389-394. 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2001.00926.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Levine A, Shevah O, Miloh T, Wine E, Niv Y, Bujanover Y, Avni Y, Shirin H: Validation of a novel real time 13C urea breath test for rapid evaluation of Helicobacter pylori in children and adolescents. J Pediatr. 2004, 145: 112-114. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.03.025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Pathak CM, Bhasin DK, Nada R, Bhattacharya A, Khanduja KL: Changes in gastric enviroment with test meals affect the performance of 14C urea breath test. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005, 20: 1260-1265. 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2005.03885.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Israeli E, Ilan Y, Meir SB, Buenavida C, Goldin E: A novel 13C-urea breath test device for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection: continuous online measurements allow for faster test results with high accuracy. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2003, 37: 139-141. 10.1097/00004836-200308000-00009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Urita Y, Hike K, Torii N, Kikuchi Y, Watanbe T, Kurakata H, Sugimoto M, Miki K: Ten-second endoscopic breath test using a 20-mg dose of 13C-urea to detect Helicobacter pylori infection. Hepatogastroenterology. 2007, 54: 951-954.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dominguez-Munoz JE, Leodolter A, Sauerbruch T, Malfertheiner P: A citric acid solution in an optimal test drink in the 13C-urea breath test for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Gut. 1997, 40: 459-462.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Graham DY, Runke D, Anderson SY, Malaty HM, Klein PD: Citric acid as the test meal for the 13C-urea breath test. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999, 94: 1214-1217. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01069.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Rektorschek M, Weeks D, Sachs G, Melchers K: Influence of pH on metabolism and urease activity of Helicobacter pylori. Gastroenterology. 1998, 115: 628-641. 10.1016/S0016-5085(98)70142-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Scott DR, Weeks D, Hong C, Postius S, Melchers K, Sachs G: The role of internal urease in acid resistance of Helicobacter pylori. Gastroenterology. 1998, 114: 58-70. 10.1016/S0016-5085(98)70633-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Meyer-Rosberg K, Scott DR, Rex D, Melchers K, Sachs G: The effect of environmental pH on the proton motive force of Helicobacter pylori. Gastroenterology. 1996, 111: 886-900. 10.1016/S0016-5085(96)70056-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Weeks DL, Eskandari S, Scott DR, Sachs G: A H+ -Gated urea channel: The link between Helicobacter pylori urease and gastric colonization. Science. 2000, 287: 482-485. 10.1126/science.287.5452.482.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Weil J, Bell GD, Powell K, Morden A, Harrison G, Gant PW, Jones PH, Trowell JE: Omeprazole and Helicobacter pylori: temporary suppression rather than true eradication. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1991, 5: 309-313.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Leodolter A, Dominguez-Munoz JE, Von Arnim U, Malfertheiner P: Citric acid or orange juice for the 13C-urea breath test: the impact of pH and gastric emptying. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1999, 13: 1057-1062. 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1999.00557.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Shiotani A, Saeed A, Yamaoka Y, Osato MS, Klein PD, Graham DY: Citric acid-enhanced Helicobacter pylori urease activity in vivo is unrelated to gastric emptying. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001, 15: 1763-1767. 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2001.01096.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Agha A, Opekun AR, Abudayyeh S, Graham DY: Effect of different organic acids (citric, malic and ascorbic) on intragastric urease activity. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005, 21: 1145-1148. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02440.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Oztürk E, Yeşilova Z, Ilgan S, Ozgüven M, Dağalp K: Performance of acidified 14C-urea capsule breath test during pantoprazole and ranitidine treatment. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009, 24: 1248-1251. 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.05845.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamlet AK, Erlandsson KIM, Olbe L, Backman VEM, Svennerholm A-M, Pettersson AB: A simple, rapid, and highly reliable capsule-based 14C urea breath test for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1995, 30: 1058-1063. 10.3109/00365529509101607.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamlet A, Stage L, Lönroth H, Cahlin C, Nyström C, Pettersson A: A novel tablet-based 13C urea breath test for Helicobacter pylori with enhanced performance during acid suppression therapy. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1999, 34: 367-374. 10.1080/003655299750026371.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Chey WD, Chathadi KV, Montague J, Ahmed F, Murthy U: Intragastric acidification reduces the occurrence of false-negative urea breath test results in patients taking a proton pump inhibitor. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001, 96: 1028-1032. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03687.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Shirin H, Frenkel D, Shevah O, Levine A, Bruck R, Moss SF, Niv Y, Avni Y: Effect of proton pump inhibitors on the continuous real time 13C-urea breath test. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003, 98: 46-50. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07187.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Levine A, Shevah O, Shabat-Sehayek V, Aeed H, Boaz M, Moss SF, Niv Y, Avni Y, Shirin H: Masking of 13C urea breath test by proton pump inhibitors is dependent on type medication: comparison between omeprazole, pantoprazole, lansoprazole and esomeprazole. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004, 20: 117-122. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.02021.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-230X/12/8/prepub

Copyright

© Schmilovitz-Weiss et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement