Skip to main content

Table 2 Incidence of Upper Gastric Cancer in Different Age Groups in Females

From: Should every region use the same gastric cancer scanning and treatment approaches? let’s reconsider: a northeastern turkey example

 

Site

Eo

GCaF and Co

GCo

GCoA

GA

D

Total

Age group

 Under 45

n

10

23

3

12

1

2

51

 

% wag

19.6

45.1

5.9

23.5

2.0

3.9

100 %

 

% ws

8.6

14.8

9.4

18.5

1.9

33.3

11.9 %

 

% T

2.3

5.4

0.7

2.8

0.2

0.5

11.9 %

 46–55

n

13

15

8

6

12

1

55

 

% wag

23.6

27.3

14.5

10.9

21.8

1.8

100 %

 

% ws

11.2

9.7

25.0

9.2

22.6

16.7

12.9 %

 

% T

3.0

3.5

1.9

1.4

2.8

0.2

12.9 %

 56–65

n

51

43

8

3

18

1

124

 

% wag

41.1

34.7

6.5

2.4

14.5

0.8

100 %

 

% ws

44.0

27.7

25.0

4.6

34.0

16.7

29.0 %

 

% T

11.9

10.1

1.9

0.7

4.2

0.2

29.0 %

 66–75

n

32

39

12

27

10

1

121

 

% wag

26.4

32.2

9.9

22.3

8.3

0.8

100 %

 

% ws

27.6

25.2

37.5

41.5

18.9

16.7

28.3 %

% T

7.5

9.1

2.8

6.3

2.3

0.2

28.3 %

 75 +

n

10

35

1

17

12

1

76

 

% wag

13.2

46.1

1.3

22.4

15.8

1.3

100 %

 

% ws

8.6

22.6

3.1

26.2

22.6

16.7

17.8 %

 

% T

2.3

8.2

0.2

4.0

2.8

0.2

17.8 %

 

n

116

155

32

65

53

6

427

 

% wag

27.2

36.3

7.5

15.2

12.4

1.4

100 %

 

% ws

100

100

100

100

100

100

100 %

 

% T

27.2

36.3

7.5

15.2

12.4

1.4

100 %

  1. wag with in age group, ws with in site, T total, n frequency, Eo esophageal, GCaF and Co Cardia and fundus or corpus or all of them, GCo corpus, GCoA corpus and antrum, GA antrum, D duodenum