Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
19 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
9 Mar 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Everson Artifon |
19 Jun 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - omar shah |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
31 Aug 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Yucel Ustundag |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
31 Aug 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
22 Oct 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - omar shah |
31 Oct 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Yucel Ustundag |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
31 Oct 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
15 Dec 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Yucel Ustundag |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
15 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
22 Dec 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Yucel Ustundag |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
22 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 10 | |
31 Dec 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Yucel Ustundag |
Resubmission - Version 11 | ||
31 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 11 |
Publishing | ||
12 Jan 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
12 Jan 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-230X-10-2 |
You can find further information about peer review here.