Skip to main content

Table 3 Characteristics of unplanned DCRB-ESD cases

From: Comparison of efficiency and safety between dual-clip and rubber band-assisted ESD and conventional ESD for colonic lateral spreading tumors (LSTs) with different levels of technical difficulty: a retrospective case–control study

 

Age

Gender

Location

Size (mm)

circumference

Morphology

CS-CRESD score

ESD total operation time(min)

After using DCRB time (min)

Operator

Case 1

70

Female

Cecum

30–50

< 2/3

LST-G

2

39

5

Niu

Case 2

40

Male

flexure

< 30

< 2/3

LST-G

2

93

13

Niu

Case 3

61

Male

flexure

< 30

< 2/3

LST-NG

3

40

23

Niu assisted

Case 4

81

Male

Transverse colon

< 30

< 2/3

LST-G

0

71

21

Niu assisted

Case 5

66

Male

Cecum

< 30

< 2/3

LST-G

1

106

6

Niu assisted

Case 6

68

Male

Cecum

> 50

< 2/3

LST-G

3

93

33

Niu assisted

Case 7

69

Male

Descending colon

< 30

< 2/3

LST-G

0

75

43

Niu assisted

Case 8

64

Female

Ascending colon

< 30

< 2/3

LST-G

0

63

2

Niu assisted