Skip to main content

Table 1 Patients’ clinicopathological features

From: Subjective factors affecting prognosis of 469 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study of endoscopic screening

 

Our cases (n = 469)

Age

68.8 ± 9.4

Sex (men/women)

385/84 (4.6/1)

Clinical stage of disease (0/I/II/III/IV)

81/76/68/118/126

Treatment* (ESD or EMR/OPE/CT and or RT/BSC)

90/257/150/42

Outcome (alive/dead/unknown)

160/212/97

Observation period (months)

29.8

Drinking (%)

392 (83.6%)

Smoking (%)

376 (80.2%)

DM/HT/DL

80/211/86

Diagnosis opportunity (medical checkup/outpatient consultation due to symptoms)

129/270

History of cancer of other organs (%)

154 (32.8%)

Lesion location (Ce/Ut/Mt/Lt/Ae)

25/91/271/69/10

Macroscopic tumor type (0/1/2/3/4/5)

207/18/124/89/8/23

Histopathological grading (well/moderate/poor/unknown)

91/243/71/64

Cases of stenosis (%)

75 (16.0%)

5-year survival rate

 Stage 0

0.98 (95% CI 0.86–0.99)

 Stage I

0.92 (95% CI 0.77–0.98)

 Stage II

0.69 (95% CI 0.49–0.83)

 Stage III

0.35 (95% CI 0.24–0.47)

 Stage IV

0.16 (95% CI 0.07–0.29)

  1. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, n, or n (%) unless otherwise indicated
  2. ESD endoscopic submucosal dissection, EMR endoscopic mucosal resection, OPE operation, CT computed tomography, RT radiation therapy, BSC best supportive care, DM diabetes mellitus, HT hypertension, DL dyslipidemia, Ut upper thoracic esophagus, Mt middle thoracic esophagus, Lt lower thoracic esophagus, M male, F female, CI confidence interval
  3. *There was overlap of some treatments