Skip to main content

Table 4 Odds ratios for NAFLD events based on baseline abdominal obesitya or abdominal obesityc and metabolically healthy/unhealthy.b phenotype in females and males

From: Abdominal obesity phenotypes are associated with the risk of developing non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: insights from the general population

  

Odds ratios (95% confidence interval)

Crude model

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Female

MH−AO−

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

MH−AO+

18.36 (14.00, 24.07)*

3.01 (2.12, 4.29)*

2.48 (1.73, 3.57)*

2.13 (1.47, 3.09)*

MH+AO−

4.67 (3.44, 6.34)*

2.85 (2.08, 3.91)*

2.36 (1.68, 3.30)*

1.37 (0.93, 2.02)

MH+AO+

82.96 (56.16, 122.55)*

8.64 (5.34, 13.99)*

5.84 (3.48, 9.80)*

2.34 (1.32, 4.17)*

Male

MH−AO−

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

MH−AO+

9.27 (7.90, 10.87)*

2.04 (1.66, 2.50)*

1.64 (1.31, 2.04)*

1.42 (1.13, 1.78)*

MH+AO−

3.10 (2.67, 3.60)*

2.26 (1.93, 2.64)*

1.82 (1.52, 2.18)*

1.19 (0.97, 1.45)

MH+AO+

24.80 (20.15, 30.52)*

4.34 (3.36, 5.59)*

2.79 (2.10, 3.71)*

1.47 (1.08, 2.01)*

  1. Abbreviations as in Table 1;
  2. Model 1 adjusted for age, height, exercise habits, and BMI;
  3. Model 2 adjusted for model 1 plus ALT, AST, GGT, FPG, and HbA1c;
  4. Model 3 adjusted for model 2 plus TC, TG, HDL-C, drinking status, and smoking status;
  5. *Compared to the MH−AO− phenotype, P < 0.05