Skip to main content

Table 5 curative effect comparison between FCARMS and POEM group in the same HRM classification at 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year follow-up

From: Comparison of fully coated anti-reflux metal stenting and per-oral endoscopic myotomy in patients with achalasia: a propensity score-matched retrospective study

HRM classification

6-month

p

1-year

p

2-year

p

Remission

n (%)

Failure

n (%)

Remission

n (%)

Failure

n (%)

Remission

n (%)

Failure

n (%)

I

 FCARMS

3(75)

1(25)

–

3(75)

1(25)

–

3(75)

1(25)

–

 POEM

0

0

 

0

0

 

0

0

 

II

 FCARMS

26(92.9)

2(7.1)

0.55

24(85.7)

4(14.3)

0.28

18(64.3)

10(35.7)

0.02

 POEM

14(100)

0

 

14(100)

0

 

14(100)

0(0)

 

III

 FCARMS

29(100)

0(0)

0.15

25(86.2)

4(13.8)

1.00

19(65.5)

10(34.5)

0.20

 POEM

17(89.5)

2(10.5)

 

16(84.2)

3(15.8)

 

16(84.2)

3(15.8)

Â