Comparisons of six endoscopy independent scoring systems for the prediction of clinical outcomes for elderly and younger patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Table 8 Comparison of ABC, AIMS65, GBS, MSP(ASH), pRS, T-score with significant clinical endpoints in younger group

Younger group	AUC	P-value of pairwise the AUC curves
Younger group	AUC	ABC	AIMS65	GBS	MAP(ASH)	pRS	T-score
Mortality
ABC	0.958	*	0.133	< 0.01	0.091	0.123	< 0.01
AIMS65	0.862	0.133	*	0.157	0.972	0.447	0.221
GBS	0.737	< 0.01	0.157	*	0.149	< 0.01	0.897
MAP(ASH)	0.859	0.091	0.972	0.149	*	0.384	0.215
pRS	0.913	0.123	0.447	< 0.01	0.384	*	< 0.05
T-score	0.749	< 0.01	0.221	0.897	0.215	< 0.05	*
Intervetion		ABC	AIMS65	GBS	MAP(ASH)	pRS	T-score
ABC	0.725	*	< 0.05	< 0.05	< 0.05	0.495	0.088
AIMS65	0.657	< 0.05	*	< 0.01	< 0.01	0.225	< 0.01
GBS	0.802	< 0.05	< 0.01	*	0.801	< 0.01	0.625
MAP(ASH)	0.810	< 0.05	< 0.01	0.801	*	< 0.01	0.461
pRS	0.699	0.495	0.225	< 0.01	< 0.01	*	< 0.01
T-score	0.786	0.088	< 0.01	0.625	0.461	< 0.01	*
Rebleeding		ABC	AIMS65	GBS	MAP(ASH)	pRS	T-score
ABC	0.864	*	0.071	0.088	0.264	0.204	< 0.05
AIMS65	0.758	0.071	*	0.881	0.416	0.496	0.606
GBS	0.768	0.088	0.881	*	0.499	0.590	0.493
MAP(ASH)	0.808	0.264	0.416	0.499	*	0.881	0.159
pRS	0.800	0.204	0.496	0.590	0.881	*	0.204
T-score	0.723	< 0.05	0.606	0.493	0.159	0.204	*
ICU		ABC	AIMS65	GBS	MAP(ASH)	pRS	T-score
ABC	0.786	*	0.348	0.609	0.057	0.949	0.772
AIMS65	0.854	0.348	*	0.627	0.561	0.305	0.552
GBS	0.819	0.609	0.627	*	0.187	0.551	0.867
MAP(ASH)	0.891	0.057	0.561	0.187	*	< 0.05	0.186
pRS	0.782	0.949	0.305	0.551	< 0.05	*	0.721
T-score	0.807	0.772	0.552	0.867	0.186	0.721	*

Bold values indicate two scoring systems are statistically different from each other
*means that there is no need to compare the same scoring system

ISSN: 1471-230X