Skip to main content

Table 3 Characteristics of patients/lesions after propensity-score matching

From: Prophylactic clip closure for mucosal defects is associated with reduced adverse events after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a propensity-score matching analysis

Ā 

Closure group

Non-closure group

Ā 
Ā 

(61 lesions in 61 patients)

(61 lesions in 61 patients)

P value

Patients

Ā Ā Ā 

Ā Age, meanā€‰Ā±ā€‰SD (range), years

68.8ā€‰Ā±ā€‰11.0 (42ā€“86)

68.5ā€‰Ā±ā€‰11.9 (41ā€“84)

0.890

Ā Sex, male/female

38/23

38/23

1.000

Ā Antithrombotic agents, n (%)

14 (23%)

13 (21%)

0.827

Lesions

Ā Ā Ā 

Ā Location (colon/rectum)

53/8

53/8

1.000

Ā Morphology (0ā€“I/0ā€“IIa)

11/50

9/52

0.625

Ā Histology (Adenoma/M/SM1/SM2 or more/other)

20/32/4/4/1

19/33/4/4/1

0.843

Ā Specimen size, meanā€‰Ā±ā€‰SD (range), mm

41.5ā€‰Ā±ā€‰11.9 (23ā€“92)

42.9ā€‰Ā±ā€‰10.7 (27ā€“80)

0.503

Ā Tumor size, meanā€‰Ā±ā€‰SD (range), mm

29.1ā€‰Ā±ā€‰11.6 (13ā€“87)

29.2ā€‰Ā±ā€‰12.1 (14ā€“68)

0.954

Ā Simultaneous removal of other polyps*, n (%)

2 (3%)

2 (3%)

1.000

ESD outcomes

Ā Ā Ā 

Ā Procedure time of ESD, meanā€‰Ā±ā€‰SD (range), min

66.5ā€‰Ā±ā€‰28.1 (19ā€“157)

68.3ā€‰Ā±ā€‰30.6 (11ā€“197)

0.731

Ā En bloc resection rate (%)

100

100

1.000

Ā Perforation during ESD, n (%)

3 (5%)

0

0.244

  1. SD: standard deviation, ESD: endoscopic submucosal dissection
  2. *Endoscopic mucosal resection or polypectomy performed for concomitant lesions