Skip to main content

Table 1 Mayo endoscopic score and clinical relapse

From: Systematic review and meta-analysis: the advantage of endoscopic Mayo score 0 over 1 in patients with ulcerative colitis

 

Study design

Follow-up (months)

Population

MES 0 or 1

Clinical relapse

Δ% relapse

Barreiro-de Acosta et al. [32] (Spain)

Prospective

12

187

187

Mayo 0 = 126 (67.3%)

Mayo 1 = 61 (32.7%)

49 (26.2%)

Mayo 0 = 24 (19.3%)

Mayo 1 = 25 (41%)

Δ% = 21.7; p < 0.01

Narang et al. [40] (India)

Prospective

12

76

46

Mayo 0 = 36 (78.3%)

Mayo 1 = 10 (21.7%)

12 (26.1%)

Mayo 0 = 6 (16.7%)

Mayo 1 = 6 (60%)

Δ% = 43.3

Ponte et al. [30] (Portugal)

Retrospective

46–72

82

60

Mayo 0 = 32 (53.3%)

Mayo 1 = 28 (46.7%)

19 (31.7%)

Mayo 0 = 6 (18.8%)

Mayo 1 = 13 (46.4%)

Δ% = 27.6; p = 0.02

Boal Carvalho et al. [34] (Portugal)

Retrospective

12

138

138

Mayo 0 = 61 (44.2%)

Mayo 1 = 77 (55.8%)

28 (20.3%)

Mayo 0 = 7 (11.5%)

Mayo 1 = 21 (27.3%)

Δ% = 15.8; p = 0.022

Yokoyama et al. [35] (Japan)

Retrospective

60

38

24

Mayo 0 = 9 (37.5%)

Mayo 1 = 15 (62.5%)

11 (45.8%)

Mayo 0 = 2 (22%)

Mayo 1 = 9 (60%)

Δ% = 38

Kim et al. [31] (South Korea)

Retrospective

80

215

200

Mayo 0 = 113 (56.5%)

Mayo 1 = 87 (43.5%)

51 (25.5%)

Mayo 0 = 22 (19.5%)

Mayo 1 = 29 (33.3%)

Δ% = 13.8; p < 0.023

Yoshino et al. [36] (Japan)

Retrospective

16

298

88

Mayo 0 = 43 (48.9%)

Mayo 1 = 45 (51.1%)

21 (23.9%)

Mayo 0 = 7 (33.3%)

Mayo 1 = 14 (66.7%)

Δ% = 33.4; p = 0.167

López-Palacios et al. [37] (Spain)

Prospective

27

20

13

Mayo 0 = 10 (76.9%)

Mayo 1 = 3 (23.1%)

2 (15.4%)

Mayo 0 = 1 (10%)

Mayo 1 = 1 (33.3%)

Δ% = 23.3

Yamamoto et al. [27] (Japan)

Prospective

12

164

164

Mayo 0 = 84 (51%)

Mayo 1 = 80 (49%)

46 (28%)

Mayo 0 = 19 (22.6%)

Mayo 1 = 27 (33.8%)

Δ% = 11.2; p = 0.16

Frieri et al. [33] (Italy)

Prospective

36

52

46

Mayo 0 = 29 (63%)

Mayo 1 = 17 (37%)

20 (43.5%)

Mayo 0 = 9 (31%)

Mayo 1 = 11 (64.7%)

Δ% = 33.7; p < 0.0001

Lobatón et al. [28] (Belgium, Spain)

Prospective

12

96

96

Mayo 0 = 63 (66%)

Mayo 1 = 33 (34%)

22 (23%)

Mayo 0 = 13 (21%)

Mayo 1 = 9 (27%)

Δ% = 6; p = 0.438

Osterman et al. [29] (USA)

Prospective

12

100

61

Mayo 0 = 5 (8.2%)

Mayo 1 = 56 (91.8%)

8 (13.1%)

Mayo 0 = 0 (0%)

Mayo 1 = 8 (14.3%)

Δ% = 14.3

Inoue et al. [41] (Japan)

Retrospective (Abstract)

39

331

254

Mayo 0 = 176 (69%)

Mayo 1 = 78 (31%)

53

Mayo 0 = 20 (11.4%)

Mayo 1 = 33 (42.3%)

Δ% = 30.9; p = 0.017

Kanazawa et al. [39] (Japan)

Retrospective

24

166

166

Mayo 0 = 91 (54.8%)

Mayo 1 = 75 (45.2%)

9

Mayo 0 = 3 (3.3%)

Mayo 1 = 6 (8%)

Δ% = 4.7

Sakemi et al. [38] (Japan)

Retrospective (Abstract)

36

74

74

Mayo 0 = 23 (31%)

Mayo 1 = 51 (69%)

26

Mayo 0 = 2 (9%)

Mayo 1 = 23 (46%)

Δ% = 37