Skip to main content

Table 2 Clinical outcome

From: Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy versus laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a pilot study

 

ERAT group

(n = 33)

LA group

(n = 33)

OA group

(n = 33)

P value

ERAT-LA

ERAT-OA

LA-OA

Treatment Success, n (%)

29 (87.88)

32 (96.97)

33 (100)

0.123

   

Definite acute uncomplicated appendicitis, n (%)

33 (100)

33 (100)

33 (100)

    

Appendicoliths removal, n (%)

8 (66.67)

NA

NA

    

Stent d rainage, n(%)

29 (87.88)

NA

NA

    

Failed cannulation, n (%)

4 (12.12)

NA

NA

    

Transferred to surgery, n (%)

4 (12.12)

NA

NA

    

Normalization of WBC count, days

   

0.351

   

0–1

16

12

17

    

1–3

5

12

9

    

> 3

2

0

2

    

Normalization neutrophil percentages, days

   

0.607

   

0–1

15

11

7

    

1–3

11

14

19

    

> 3

4

2

2

    

Normalization of CRP, days

   

0.147

   

0–1

3

1

3

    

1–3

5

10

2

    

> 3

7

2

3

    

Normalization of temperature, median (25th, 75th percentile), days

2 (1, 3)

1 (1, 2)

2 (1, 3)

0.194

   

LOS, median (25th, 75th percentile), days

5 (4, 6)

4 (3, 5)

4 (3, 5)

0.054

   

Total cost, median (25th, 75th percentile), RMB

10,983.25 (10,210.26, 13,028.25)

14,517.22 (12,991.05, 15,528.25)

8246.82 (6819.71, 9530.22)

 < 0.001

0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

  1. ERAT, endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy; LA, laparoscopic appendectomy; OA, open appendectomy; NA, not applicable; WBC, white blood cell; CRP, C-reactive protein; LOS, length of hospital stay