Skip to main content

Table 2 ESD procedure outcomes (expert endoscopist): multi-loop traction device-assisted ESD versus conventional ESD (n = 12) in the ex vivo pilot study

From: Multi-loop traction device facilitates gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: ex vivo pilot study and an inaugural clinical experience

 

M-ESD (n = 6)

C-ESD (n = 6)

p value

Rate of en bloc resection (%)

100 (6/6)

100 (6/6)

Rate of R0 resection (%)

100 (6/6)

100 (6/6)

Rate of accidental complications (perforation) during ESD (%)

0 (0–6)

0 (0–6)

Overall procedure time (min); median (IQR)

17.0 (13.3–18.5)

22.5 (14.5–29)

0.20

Local injection time (min); median (IQR)

3 (2.3–3)

3 (2.3–3)

1

Perimeter incision time (min); median (IQR)

3.5 (2.3–5.5)

4.5 (3–6)

0.68

MLTD attachment time (min); median (IQR)

2.0 (1.3–2.8)

Submucosal dissection time (min); median (IQR)

3 (2.3–6)

12.5 (8.3–17.5)

< 0.05

MLTD extraction time (min); median (IQR)

1.0 (1–1)

Total local injection volume (mL); median (IQR)

17.5 (11.3–23.8)

21.5 (14–24.5)

0.47

Specimen area (mm2); median (IQR)

706.5 (471–942)

647.6 (458.0–812.5)

0.42

Number of additional local injections; median (IQR)

0 (0–0)

0 (0–0)

0.32

  1. ESD, Endoscopic submucosal dissection; MLTD, multi-loop traction device; IQR, interquartile range; C-ESD, conventional ESD; M-ESD, Multi-loop traction device-assisted ESD