Skip to main content

Table 1 Multi-loop traction device-assisted ESD versus conventional ESD in the ex vivo pilot study

From: Multi-loop traction device facilitates gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: ex vivo pilot study and an inaugural clinical experience

Submucosal dissection speed (mm2/min); median (IQR)

M-ESD

C-ESD

p value

Overall (n = 24)

141.5 (60.9–177.6)

35.5 (20.8–52.3)

< 0.05

Experts only (n = 12)

168.8 (150.5–280.6)

48.0 (31.1–83.6)

< 0.05

Trainees only (n = 12)

60.2 (56.2–73.0)

23.8(20.4–42.0)

< 0.05

ESD procedure outcomes

M-ESD (n = 12)

C-ESD (n = 12)

p value

Rate of en bloc resection (%)

100 (12/12)

100 (12/12)

Rate of R0 resection (%)

100 (12/12)

100 (12/12)

Rate of accidental complications (perforation) during ESD (%)

0 (0–6)

0 (0–6)

Overall procedure time (min); median (IQR)

24.0 (17–40)

30.0 (19.8–48.8)

0.56

Local injection time (min); median (IQR)

3.5 (3–5)

3.5 (2.8–8.3)

0.91

Perimeter incision time (min); median (IQR)

7.5(3.8–16.5)

6.0 (3.8–7.3)

0.52

MLTD attachment time (min); median (IQR)

2.5 (2–3)

Submucosal dissection time (min); median (IQR)

7.5 (3–11.3)

20.0 (10.5–27)

< 0.05

MLTD retrieving time (min); median (IQR)

1.0 (1–1)

Total local injection volume (mL); median (IQR)

22.5 (16.5–29)

24.0 (18–34.8)

0.58

Specimen area (mm2); median (IQR)

854.1 (559.3–1003.2)

637.8 (559.3–847.8)

0.27

Number of additional local injections; median (IQR)

0 (0–0)

0 (0–0.3)

0.68

  1. C-ESD, conventional ESD; ESD, Endoscopic submucosal dissection; M-ESD, Multi-loop traction device-assisted ESD; MLTD, multi-loop traction device; IQR, interquartile range