Skip to main content

Table 2 Meta-analysis of the clinicopathological significance of HSP70 expression in patients with gastric cancer

From: Clinicopathological significance of HSP70 expression in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Clinicopathological features

Reference count

Heterogeneity (I-squared, p)

Model

OR with 95% CI

P value

Conclusion

Age (≤ 60 years vs > 60)

2

0.0%, 0.458

Fixed

1.07(0.61–1.87)

0.809

Not significant

Gender (male vs female)

8

1.0%,0.421

Fixed

1.18(0.91–1.53)

0.217

Not significant

Depth of invasion (T3/T4 vs T1/T2)

7

80.9%, < 0.001

Random

1.01(0.45–2.30)

0.975

Not significant

Differentiation degrees (low vs high)

5

0.0%, 0. 479

Fixed

0.49(0.37–0.65)

 < 0.001

Significant

H.pylori infection (positive vs negative)

2

48.3%, 0.164

Fixed

2.04(0.82–5.03)

0.123

Not significant

Histological subtypes (intestinal vs diffuse)

4

43.0%, 0.153

Fixed

2.19(1.59–3.01)

 < 0.001

Significant

Lymph node invasion (positive vs negative)

9

74.2%, < 0.001

Random

1.28(0.72–2.30)

0.399

Not significant

TNM stages (I/II vs III/IV)

6

74.2%, 0.002

Random

1.15(0.60–2.24)

0.672

Not significant

Lymphovascular invasion (positive vs negative)

5

22.9%,0.268

Fixed

1.54(1.19–2.00)

0.001

Significant

Metastasis (positive vs negative)

5

59.4%,0.043

Random

1.61(0.50–5.25)

0.426

Not significant

  1. HSP70 heat shock protein 70; OR odds ratio; CI confidence interval