Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of survey regarding workflow and infection prevention and control strategies of endoscopic unit during COVID-19 pandemic

From: Effect of COVID-19 pandemic on workflows and infection prevention strategies of endoscopy units in Hungary: a cross-sectional survey

Results of cross-sectional survey (N = 120)

Distribution of answers based on the regional cumulative incidence of COVID-19 infection

Low risk region: 43 (35.83%)

Medium risk region: 28 (23.33%)

High risk region: 49 (40.83%)

Distribution of answers based on the capacity of endoscopy unit

Low capacity lab: 47 (39.17%)

Medium capacity lab: 34 (28.33%)

High capacity lab: 38 (31.67%)

Decrease in the number of endoscopic examinations during COVID-19 pandemic

< 25% decrease: 2 (1.67%)

25–50% decrease: 10 (8.35%)

50–75% decrease: 32 (26.67%)

> 75% decrease: 76 (63.33%)

Endoscopic modality the number of which is decreased during COVID-19 pandemic

Gastroscopy: 114 (95%)

Colonoscopy: 110 (91.67%)

ERCP: 81 (67.50%)

EUS: 74 (61.67%)

Rate of endoscopists who were dropped out of work

< 20% of endoscopists: 73 (80.84%)

20–40% of endoscopists: 22 (18.33%)

> 40% of endoscopist: 15 (20.83%)

Rate of nurses who were dropped out of work

< 20% of nurses: 90 (75.00%)

20–40% of nurses: 12 (10.00%)

> 40% of nurses: 18 (15.00%)

Problems in relation with decreased number of healthcare professionals in endoscopy unit

It substantially affected the operation of endoscopy unit: 21 (17.50%)

No negative effect was observed: 99 (82.50%)

Knowledge of Position Statement of ESGE and ESGENA

Yes: 117 (97.50%)

No: 3 (2.50%)

Risk of endoscopic staff for COVID-19 infection

Increased: 118 (98.33%)

Not increased: 2 (1.67%)

Which endoscopic modality has the highest risk for COVID-19 infection?

Risk of modalities is same: 54 (45.00%)

Upper endoscopic examinations: 66 (55.00%)

Lower endoscopic examinations: 0 (0.00%)

Training about prevention of COVID-19 infection in endoscopy unit

Yes: 40 (33.33%)

 

No: 80 (66.67%)

Change in personal protective equipment in cases of high-risk patients

Mask: (41 (43.17%)

Protective gown: 63 (52.50%)

Nothing, because adequate personal protective equipment is not available: 14 (11.67%)

Nothing, I am not afraid of infection: 2 (1.67%)

Minimization of number of persons in the lab during examination

Yes: 113 (94.17%)

Administrator stays in the lab: 5 (1.67%)

Young doctor stays in the lab, who is learning endoscopy: 2 (1.67%)

Giving surgical mask to patient during examination

Never: 11 (9.17%)

Sometimes: 18 (15.00%)

Patients can use their own mask: 17 (14.17%)

Only during colonoscopy: 11 (9.17%)

Always: 63 (52.50%)

Negative pressure room

Yes: 1 (0.83%)

No: 199 (99.17%)

Adequate ventilation

No: 6 (5.00%)

Natural ventilation through opening windows: 90 (75.00%)

Mixed mode of mechanical ventilation: 18 (15.00%)

Air purification 6 (5.00%)

Cleaning and sterilization of air

Ultraviolet (UV) irradiation: 21 (17.50%)

Ozone treatment: 2 (1.67%)

  1. COVID-19 coronavirus disease 19, EUS endoscopic ultrasound, ERCP endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, ESGE European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, ESGENA European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associats