Skip to main content

Table 4 Characteristics and results of studies externally validating PDRI and P-PASS

From: Risk indices predicting graft use, graft and patient survival in solid pancreas transplantation: a systematic review

Study, year (transplant type) Risk index (including any risk groups) Cohort size, source (study dates) Outcome Handling of missing data Other sources of bias or applicability concerns Discrimination (or other analysis of association with outcome performed) Calibration* Study conclusion
Amaral PHF 2015
(All) [36]
PDRI
 ≤ 1.0, > 1.0—< 1.5
 ≥ 1.5
570 pancreas recipients four hospitals, Brazil (1996–2011) 1-year pancreas survival Complete case analysis (Only 27% of cohort with PDRI) No treatment details
No comparison of baseline data to derivation study
Graft failure undefined
Donor race coded differently to derivation
Different PDRI cutoffs to derivation (no reason given)
Unclear if graft survival was censored
NI Observed: 23 pancreas failed
Predicted: NI
PDRI not associated with 1-year pancreas survival
Ayami MS 2018 (All) [37] PDRI
 < 1, 1–1.5, > 1.5
327 pancreas recipients at a single centre, Gernany (2002–2015) 1-, 5-,10-year pancreas, kidney and patient survival Complete case analysis (Only 98.5% of cohort with PDRI No treatment details
No baseline demographics of predictor variables in cohort
No comparison of baseline data to derivation study
Different PDRI cutoffs (and not analysed as a continuous model)
Donor race set to Caucasian
NI Observed: 72 pancreas failed
Predicted: NI
PDR I > 1.5 associated with worse pancreas survival, but no differences between other risk groups
PDRI not associated with kidney or patient survival
Blok JJ 2016 (All) [8] PDRI
 < 1.24, ≥ 1.24 (median) and as CN
349 pancreas recipients at a single centre, Germany (1984–2013) 1-, 5-, 10-year pancreas survival (DC) Complete case analysis (Only 98.6% of cohort with PDRI) No treatment details
Donor race set to Caucasian as not collected by Eurotransplant,
No comparison of baseline data to derivation study
Different cutoffs for PDRI (median)
PDRI by categories:
C-statistic 0.69 (SE 0.045)
PDRI as a CN model:
NI
Observed: 54 pancreas failed at 1 year
Predicted: NI
PDRI ≥ 1.24 associated with worse 1-, 5-, 10-years pancreas survival but not when analyzed as a CN model
Franz C 2019 (SPK, PAK) [38] PDRI
 ≥ 1.198 vs < 1.198 (median)
108 pancreas recipients at a single centre, Germany (2000–2017) 1-, 5-year pancreas survival (DC) NMD No comparison of baseline data to derivation study
PDRI with different cut-offs from original (and not analysed as a continuous model)
NI Observed: 27 pancreas failed at 1 year
Predicted: NI
PDRI ≥ 1.198 vs < 1.198 not associated with all outcomes
Horvath S 2015
(All) [39]
PDRI
 > 1.57, ≤ 1.57
119 pancreas recipients from single centre, UK (period not clear) 1-year pancreas survival Complete case analysis
(Only 97% of cohort with PDRI)
No treatment details (abstract)
Graft failure undefined
PDRI with different cutoffs
Unclear if graft survival was censored
No baseline demographics of predictor variables in cohort
NI NI PDRI not associated with 1-year pancreas survival
Kopp W 2016 (pancreas donors) [40] P-PASS < 17, ≥ 17 and as CN 10,444 pancreas donors from Eurotransplant registry (2004–2014) Donor pancreas accepted, procured, transplanted Complete case analysis (Only 93.7% of cohort with P-PASS) No comparison of baseline data to derivation study
Donor race set to Caucasian as not collected routinely
C-statistic for P-PASS in donors:
Reported vs non-reported (0.63, 95% CI 0.62–0.63)
Accepted vs non-accepted (0.68, 95% CI 0.67–0.69)
Procured vs non-procured (0.68, 95% CI 0.67–0.69)
Transplanted vs non-transplanted (0.73, 95% CI 0.72–0.74)
Observed: 4354 (41.7%) donor pancreas declined
Predicted: 6298 (60.3%) donors with P-PASS ≥ 17
O/E ratio: 0.69
P-PASS < 17 associated with reported, accepted, procured and transplanted pancreas donors vs P-PASS ≥ 17
Lan L 2010 (pancreas donors) [45] Modified P-PASS (minus serum sodium) (CN) 220 pancreas donors from a single centre, Australia (2005–2008) Donor pancreas acceptance NI No treatment details (abstract)
Serum sodium not included as not collected by registry (different to derivation)
No comparison of baseline data to derivation study
NI Observed: 93 donor pancreas declined
Predicted: NI
Modified P-PASS associated with pancreas donor acceptance
Mittal S 2013
(SPK and PTA) [41]
PDRI
0.64–0.85
0.86–1.15
1.16–1.56
1.57–2.11
2.11–2.56
 > 2.57
90 pancreas recipients from a single centre, UK (2011) 1-year pancreas survival NMD Graft failure undefined
No treatment details
NI O/E ratio: 0.84–1.1 (SPK)
0.76–1.12 (PTA)
Higher PDRI quintiles associated with 1-year pancreas survival for SPK but not PTA
Mittal S 2015
(All) [42]
PDRI (CN) 1265 pancreas recipients from a national registry, UK (2004–2011) 1-year pancreas survival (DC) Complete case analysis
(Only 76% of cohort with PDRI)
None NI Observed: NI
Predicted: NI
PDRI associated with 1-year pancreas survival for SPK
  PDRI
0.64–0.85
0.86–1.15
1.16–1.56
1.57–2.11
     NI NI PDRI quartile 0.64–0.85 associated with better 1-year pancreas survival for SPK vs quartiles 1.16–1.56, 1.57–2.11
Rodriguez-Villar C 2018 (Pancreas donors) [34] P-PASS
 < 17, ≥ 17
78 pancreas donors at a single centre, Spain (2016–2017) Donor pancreas acceptance NMD No comparison of baseline data to derivation study NI Observed: 41 donor pancreas declined
Predicted: 57 donor pancreas declined
O/E ratio: 0.72
P-PASS associated with donor pancreas acceptance
Salamanca-Bustos JJ 2016 (SPK) [9] PDRI
0.64–0.85
0.86–1.15
1.16–1.56
1.57–2.11
2.12–2.86
126 pancreas recipients at a single-centre, Spain (2000–2015) 1-year pancreas survival Complete case analysis
(Only 94% of cohort with PDRI)
All donors set to Caucasian
No treatment details
No comparison of baseline data to derivation study
NI Observed: 16 pancreas failure
Predicted: NI
PDRI in quintiles not associated with 1-year pancreas survival
Smigielska K 2018 (All) [11] PDRI (CN) 408 pancreas recipients at multiple centres, Poland (1998–2015) 1-year pancreas survival Complete case analysis
(Only 73% of cohort with PDRI)
No treatment details
No comparison of baseline data to derivation study
AUROC for
PDRI: 0.524
Observed: 139 pancreas failure
Predicted: NI
PDRI not associated with 1-year pancreas
  1. All graft survival is uncensored for death unless otherwise stated
  2. *Observed and expected outcomes are for 1-year pancreas survival for PDRI and donor pancreas acceptance for P-PASS (both the outcomes PDRI and P-PASS were derived against respectively) unless otherwise specified
  3. **Based on mean/median PDRI for entire cohort
  4. A abstract, CIT cold ischaemia time, CN continuous, DC death-censored (all studies non-DC unless stated), DP donor pancreas, F full-text, MC multicentre, NI no information, NMD no missing data, O/E observed and predicted (expected) ratio, PDRI pancreas donor risk index, PGS pancreas graft survival, P-PASS pre-procurement pancreas allocation suitability score, PTA pancreas transplant alone, R registry, SC single centre, SE standard error, UK United Kingdom, USA United States of America