Skip to main content

Table 1 The clinicopathologic characteristics of patients in the training and validation cohorts

From: A prognostic model for stratification of stage IB/IIA esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study

Variable

All cohort

Training cohort

Validation cohort

P value

N = 153 (%)

N = 123

%

N = 30

%

Sex

     

0.248*

 Male

115 (75.2)

90

73.2

25

83.3

 

 Female

38 (24.8)

33

26.8

5

16.7

Age (year, mean ± SD)

59.7 ± 8.9

59.5 ± 9.0

60.5 ± 8.8

0.583**

Smoking status

     

0.157*

 No

58 (37.9)

50

40.7

8

26.7

 

 Yes

95 (62.1)

73

59.3

22

73.3

Drinking status

     

0.379*

 No

107 (69.9)

88

71.5

19

63.3

 

 Yes

46 (30.1)

35

28.5

11

36.7

Tumor length (cm, mean ± SD)

3.6 ± 1.5

3.7 ± 1.7

3.3 ± 1.0

0.227**

PD-L1 expression

     

0.780*

 Low

80 (52.3)

65

52.8

15

50.0

 

 High

73 (47.7)

58

47.2

15

50.0

Surgery approach

     

0.156*

 Left thorax

108 (70.6)

90

73.2

18

60.0

 

 Right thorax

45 (29.4)

33

26.8

12

40.0

Differentiation

     

0.013*

 Well-moderate

71 (46.4)

51

41.5

20

66.7

 

 Poor

82 (53.6)

72

58.5

10

33.3

pT stage

     

0.549*

 T2

59 (38.6)

46

37.4

13

43.3

 

 T3

94 (61.4)

77

62.6

17

56.7

NLNs (mean ± SD)

19.7 ± 14.1

19.3 ± 13.9

21.4 ± 14.9

0.470**

pTNM stage

     

0.102*

 IB

52 (34.0)

38

30.9

14

46.7

 

 IIA

101 (66.0)

85

69.1

16

53.3

LNs dissection of left recurrent laryngeal nerve

     

0.592*

 No

47 (30.7)

39

31.7

8

26.7

 

 Yes

106 (69.3)

84

68.3

22

73.3

 

LNs dissection of right recurrent laryngeal nerve

     

0.415*

 No

45 (29.4)

38

30.9

7

23.3

 

 Yes

108 (70.6)

85

69.1

23

76.7

 

Dissection of left gastric artery LNs

     

1.00***

 No

9 (5.9)

7

5.7

2

6.7

 

 Yes

144 (94.1)

116

94.3

28

93.3

 

Dissection of subcarinal LNs

     

0.69***

 No

10 (6.5)

9

7.3

1

3.3

 

 Yes

143 (93.5)

114

92.7

29

96.7

 
  1. NLNs, the number of lymph nodes; LNs, lymph nodes
  2. *P value was calculated by χ2 test; **P value was calculated by student’s t test; ***Fisher exact test