Skip to main content

Table 2 Sensitivity analysis for overall survival

From: The prognostic role of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio on overall survival in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Excluding study

Including studies

HR and 95% CI

P value

Heterogeneity (%)

P value for heterogeneity

Aliustaoglu [23]

22,24–49

1.36 (1.23–1.50)

< 0.001

67.9

< 0.001

Lee [32]

22–31,33–49

1.36 (1.23–1.50)

< 0.001

68.8

< 0.001

Jiang [30]

22–29,31–49

1.38 (1.25–1.53)

< 0.001

68.8

< 0.001

Wang [45]

22–44,46–49

1.38 (1.25–1.52)

< 0.001

69.3

< 0.001

Lian [33]

22–32,34–49

1.35 (1.23–1.49)

< 0.001

67.0

< 0.001

Aldemir [22] (a)

23–49

1.38 (1.25–1.52)

< 0.001

69.2

< 0.001

Aldemir [22] (b)

23–49

1.36 (1.23–1.50)

< 0.001

68.7

< 0.001

Deng [24]

22,23,25–49

1.39 (1.25–1.53)

< 0.001

68.3

< 0.001

Gunaldi [28]

22–27,29–49

1.37 (1.24–1.51)

< 0.001

69.2

< 0.001

Hsu [29]

22–28,30–49

1.38 (1.25–1.53)

< 0.001

68.8

< 0.001

Kim [31]

22–30,32–49

1.39 (1.25–1.53)

< 0.001

68.2

< 0.001

Liu [34]

22–33,35–49

1.38 (1.25–1.52)

< 0.001

69.3

< 0.001

Sun [39]

22–38,40–49

1.38 (1.25–1.53)

< 0.001

69.1

< 0.001

Wang [42]

22–41,43–49

1.33 (1.22–1.45)

< 0.001

55.8

< 0.001

Feng [25] (a)

22–24,26–49

1.37 (1.23–1.52)

< 0.001

68.9

< 0.001

Feng [25] (b)

22–24,26–49

1.36 (1.23–1.51)

< 0.001

68.1

< 0.001

Sun [40]

22–39,41–49

1.37 (1.24–1.51)

< 0.001

69.2

< 0.001

Zhou [49]

22–48

1.37 (1.24–1.52)

< 0.001

69.3

< 0.001

Wen [46]

22–45,47–49

1.37 (1.24–1.51)

< 0.001

69.3

< 0.001

Fuentes [26]

22–25,27–49

1.36 (1.23–1.49)

< 0.001

68.0

< 0.001

Song [38]

22–37,39–49

1.39 (1.28–1.52)

< 0.001

54.1

< 0.001

Wang [43]

22–42,44–49

1.37 (1.24–1.51)

< 0.001

69.3

< 0.001

Wang [44]

22–43,45–49

1.37 (1.24–1.52)

< 0.001

69.3

< 0.001

Ramos-Esquivel [36]

22–35,37–49

1.37 (1.24–1.51)

< 0.001

69.3

< 0.001

Petrillo [35]

22–34,36–49

1.37 (1.24–1.51)

< 0.001

69.3

< 0.001

Saito [37]

22–36,38–49

1.36 (1.23–1.50)

< 0.001

68.5

< 0.001

Gong [27]

22–26,28–49

1.37 (1.24–1.51)

< 0.001

69.4

< 0.001

Zhang [48]

22–47,49

1.37 (1.24–1.52)

< 0.001

69.3

< 0.001

Tang [41]

22–40,42–49

1.37 (1.24–1.51)

< 0.001

69.3

< 0.001

Zhang [47]

22–46,48,49

1.38 (1.25–1.53)

< 0.001

68.9

< 0.001