Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

From: Application of artificial intelligence in chronic liver diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study/year

Country

Study cohort

Population

AI classifier

AI modality

Development cohort

Validation cohort

Validation methods

Stage

Sensitivity

Specificity

TP

FP

TN

FN

Zhang, 2012 [25]

China

Prospective

Chronic hepatitis B, C

ANN

USG

F1/F2/F3/F4

40/22/55/62

F1/F2/F3/F4

13/8/19/20

Independent test set

F4

0.95

0.85

19

6

34

1

Chen, 2017 [27]

China

Prospective

Chronic hepatitis B

NBa, RFa, KNN, SVM

Elastography

S0/S1/S2/S3/S4

119/164/88/72/70

N/A

k-fold cross validation

F4

0.6866

0.8854

48

51

392

22

≥ F3

0.7866

0.8738

112

47

324

30

≥ F2

0.7471

0.8621

172

39

244

58

≥ F1

0.7967

0.8250

314

21

98

80

Choi, 2018 [29]

Korea

Retrospective

General population

CNN

CT

F0/F1/F2/F3/F4

3357/113/284/460/3247

F0/F1/F2/F3/F4

118/109/161/173/330

Independent test set

F4

0.846

0.966

279

19

242

51

≥ F3

0.946

0.954

476

18

370

27

≥ F2

0.955

0.899

634

23

204

30

Yasaka, 2018 [30]

Japan

Retrospective

General population

CNN

CT

F0/F1/F2/F3/F4

113/36/56/66/125

F0/F1/F2/F3/F4

29/9/14/16/32

Independent test set

F4

0.75

0.57

24

29

39

8

≥ F3

0.75

0.65

36

18

34

12

≥ F2

0.76

0.68

47

12

26

15

Yasaka, 2018 [32]

Japan

Retrospective

General population

CNN

MRI

F0/F1/F2/F3/F4

54/53/81/113/233

F0/F1/F2/F3/F4

10/10/15/20/45

Independent test set

F4

0.76

0.76

34

13

42

11

≥ F3

0.78

0.74

51

9

26

14

≥ F2

0.84

0.65

76

3

7

14

Li, 2019 [23]

China

Prospective

Chronic hepatitis B

Adaboosta, DT, LR, ANN, RF, SVM

USG

F0/F1/F2/F3/F4

15/33/38/23/35

N/A

Tenfold cross validation

≥ F2

0.875

0.769

84

11

37

12

Wang, 2019 [28]

China

Prospective

Chronic hepatitis B

CNN

Elastography

F0-1/F2/F3/F4

43/72/85/66

F0-1/F2/F3/F4

22/37/41/32

Independent test set

F4

0.969

0.88

31

12

88

1

≥ F3

0.904

0.983

66

1

58

7

≥ F2

0.691

0.909

76

2

20

34

Ahmed, 2020 [31]

Egypt

Prospective

Chronic hepatitis C

SVM

MRI

22 fibrotic patients

15 healthy patients

N/A

Leave one out cross validation

≥ F1

0.818

0.866

18

2

13

4

Lee, 2020 [22]

Korea

Retrospective

Chronic liver disease, hepatitis B, C

CNN

USG

F0/F1/F23/F4

363/394/1652/1566

F0/F1/F23/F4

290/17/72/193

Independent test set

F4

0.778

0.937

150

24

355

43

≥ F2

0.913

0.824

242

54

253

23

Schawkat, 2020 [40]

Switzerland

Prospective

General population

SVM

MRI

F0/F1/F2/F3/F4

5/7/13/8/8

F0/F1/F2/F3/F4

3/5/5/5/3

Independent test set

≥ F3

0.750

0.923

6

1

12

2

Piscaglia, 2006 [37]

Spain

Retrospective

Chronic hepatitis C

ANN

Clinical data

F0/F1/F3/F4

216/176/87/31

F3/total

23/96

Independent test set

≥ F3

0.783

0.890

18

8

65

5

Wang, 2010 [36]

China

Retrospective

Chronic hepatitis C

ANN

Clinical data

F0-1/F2-4

166/60

F0-1/F2-4

80/36

Independent test set

≥ F2

0.917

0.800

33

16

64

3

Raoufy, 2011 [39]

Iran

Prospective

Chronic hepatitis B

ANN

Clinical data

Cirrhotic/non-cirrhotic

11/75

Cirrhotic/non-cirrhotic

8/50

Independent test set

F4

0.875

0.920

7

4

46

1

Pournik, 2014 [35]

Iran

Retrospective

NAFLD patients

ANN

Clinical data

Cirrhotic/non-cirrhotic

52/248

Cirrhotic/non-cirrhotic

15/65

Independent test set

F4

0.66

0.99

44

4

309

23

Shousha, 2018 [34]

Egypt

Retrospective

Chronic hepatitis C

ANNa, DT

Clinical data

F0-2/F3-4

204/223

N/A

k-fold cross validation

≥ F3

0.825

0.811

184

39

165

39

Wei, 2018 [33]

USA

Retrospective

Chronic hepatitis B, C

DT, RF, GBa

Clinical data

S0/S1/S2/S3/S4

46/169/134/56/85

S0/S1/S2/S3/S4

15/21/12/11/27

Independent test set

S4

0.78

0.85

21

9

50

6

≥ S3

0.84

0.85

32

7

41

6

Li, 2019 [38]

China

Retrospective

Chronic hepatitis B

DTa, RFa, LR, SVM

Clinical data

460 patients

460 patients

Independent test set

F4

0.596

0.705

56

108

258

38

≥ F3

0.939

0.803

176

54

219

11

≥ F2

0.970

0.763

319

31

100

10

Kuppili, 2017 [26]

Portugal

Prospective

Mixed population

ELM

USG

NAFLD/non-NAFLD

36/27 patients

N/A

K-fold cross validation

 

0.913

0.921

33

2

25

3

Byra, 2018 [24]

Poland

Prospective

Obese population

CNN

USG

NAFLD/non-NAFLD

38/17 patients

N/A

Leave one out cross validation

 

1.000

0.882

38

2

15

0

  1. ANN artificial neural networks, CNN convolutional neural networks, NB Naïve Bayes, RF random forest, KNN k-nearest neighbor, SVM support vector machine, MLP multilayer perception, DT decision tree, GB gradient boosting, LR logistic regression, ELM extreme learning machine, F4 diagnosis of cirrhosis, ≥ F3 diagnosis of advanced fibrosis (F3–F4), ≥ F2 diagnosis of significant fibrosis (F2–F4)
  2. aSelected AIs in the analysis