Skip to main content

Table 3 Baseline characteristics of the patients before (entire cohort) and after propensity score matching (matched cohort)

From: Severe weight loss after minimally invasive oesophagectomy is associated with poor survival in patients with oesophageal cancer at 5 years

 

Whole cohort

p valuea

Matched cohort

p valuea

 

FT group (n = 184)

No-FT group (n = 133)

FT group (n = 119)

No-FT group (n = 119)

Elderly patients (> 75)

23 (13%)

10 (8%)

0.14b

5 (4%)

6 (5%)

0.56b

Gender (%)

  

0.45b

  

0.70b

 Male

163 (89%)

114 (86%)

 

104 (87%)

102 (86%)

 

 Female

23 (11%)

21 (14%)

 

14 (13%)

15 (14%)

 

Tumor location

  

0.33b

  

0.26b

 Ut/Mt/Lt

31/86/67

30/53/50

 

19/56/44

29/49/41

 

Depth of tumor invasion

  

0.044b

  

0.24b

 cT1-2

107 (58%)

92 (69%)

 

91 (76%)

83 (69%)

 

 cT3-4

77 (42%)

41 (36%)

 

28 (24%)

36 (31%)

 

Lymph node metastasis (cN+)

101 (55%)

64 (48%)

0.23b

57 (48%)

56 (47%)

0.89b

Preoperative therapy (+)

133 (72%)

68 (51%)

0.0001c

49 (41%)

52 (44%)

0.69b

Preoperative body weight (kg)

56 (32–80)

58 (36–85)

0.21 c

57 (32–79)

58 (36–85)

0.87c

Anastomotic leakage* (+)

22 (12%)

13 (9.8%)

0.53

17 (14%)

11 (9.2%)

0.23

Pulmonary complication* (+)

11 (6%)

7 (5.3%)

0.79

4 (3.4%)

4 (3.4%)

1.00

Recurrent nerve palsy* (+)

5 (2.7%)

8 (6%)

0.14

2 (1.7%)

6 (5%)

0.14

  1. FT feeding jejunostomy tube
  2. *Postoperative morbidity was analyzed according to the Clavien–Dindo classification (3 and 4)
  3. aComparison between the FT and no-FT groups
  4. bχ2 test
  5. cStudent’s t-test