Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of pooled results including biochemical variables

From: The clinical efficacy and adverse effects of Entecavir plus Thymosin alpha-1 combination therapy versus Entecavir Monotherapy in HBV-related cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Variable

Studies included (n)

Patients included (n)

SMD

95%CI

Significance, P

Heterogeneity

P

I2

ALB

 After treatment, EG vs. CG

2

90

−0.38

−2.12, 1.37

0.67

0.0001

93%

 EG, before vs. after

2

90

−1.62

− 2.87, − 0.36

0.01

0.02

81%

 CG, before vs. after

2

90

−1.37

−2.05, −0.68

< 0.0001

0.15

51%

AST

 After treatment, EG vs. CG

4

364

−1.33

− 1.59, − 1.06

< 0.00001

0.31

14%

 EG, before vs. after

4

364

8.89

3.45, 14.32

0.001

< 0.00001

99%

 CG, before vs. after

4

364

7.56

2.47, 12.64

0.004

< 0.00001

99%

ALT

 After treatment, EG vs. CG

6

454

−1.12

−1.70, −0.55

0.0001

< 0.00001

87%

 EG, before vs. after

6

454

10.45

5.83, 15.08

< 0.00001

< 0.00001

99%

 CG, before vs. after

6

454

11.61

6.69, 16.53

< 0.00001

< 0.00001

99%

TBIL

 After treatment, EG vs. CG

6

454

−0..35

1.22, 0.53

0.44

< 0.00001

95%

 EG, before vs. after

6

454

3.31

1.28, 5.34

0.001

< 0.00001

98%

 CG, before vs. after

6

454

3.26

1.54, 4.99

0.0002

< 0.00001

97%

A/G

 After treatment, EG vs. CG

3

314

0.47

−0.88, 1.82

0.49

< 0.00001

97%

 EG, before vs. after

3

314

−1.26

−2.19, −0.33

0.008

< 0.00001

93%

 CG, before vs. after

3

314

−1.06

−1.30, −0.83

< 0.00001

0.61

0%

  1. CG control group, the group with ETV monotherapy, EG experimental group, the group with ETV plus Tα1 combination therapy, SMD standardized mean difference, CI confidence interval, ALT alanine aminotransferase, ALB albumin, TBIL total bilirubin; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; A/G, the albumin globulin ratio