Skip to main content

Table 3 Prevalence pattern of anastomotic stricture

From: Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study

Anastomosis stricture

Status

Two weeks

4 Month

8 Month

12 Month

P value *

Anastomosis technique

Hand-sewn

Present

0 (0%)

28 (10.8%)

37 (14.2%)

23 (8.8%)

0.004

Not present

0 (0%)

231 (89.2%)

222 (85.8%)

236 (91.2%)

McNemar

Base

0.008

0.083

0.083

Stapled anastomosis

Present

0 (0%)

9 (6%)

8 (5.3%)

4 (2.6%)

0.263

Not present

0 (0%)

141 (94%)

142 (94.7%)

146 (97.4%)

McNemar

Base

0.005

0.083

0.046

Statistical Tests

Chi-Square

1

0.07

0.003

0.01

 

Mixed Model

Pv Group = 0.029, Pv Time = 0.235

  1. *Cochran’s Q Test
  2. Prevalence pattern of anastomotic stricture in patients underwent hand-sewn and stapled anastomosis groups