Stenting as a bridge to surgery for extra-colonic malignancy induced colorectal obstruction: preliminary experience

Table 2 Clinical outcomes of SEMS insertion as BTS

Case no.	Stent characteristics			Technical Success	Bridging Success	Cause of failure	Follow-up treatment	ISS (days)	OP Name	ASOS
Case no.	SEMS type	Length (mm)	Diameter (mm)	Technical Success	Bridging Success	Cause of failure	Follow-up treatment	ISS (days)	OP Name	ASOS
1	Partially covered	120	20	Yes	No	Migration	2nd Uncovered SEMS before surgery	12	Loop ileostomy
2	Uncovered	100	24	Yes	Yes		Surgery	5	Left hemicolectomy, Wedge resection of pancreas body
3	Uncovered	80	20	Yes	Yes		Surgery	8	Ileostomy
4	Uncovered	100	24	Yes	No	Insufficient expansion	2nd partially covered SEMS before surgery	15	LAR, Salphingoophorectomy
5	Covered	80	20	Yes	Yes		Surgery	32	Segmental resection and anastomosis of S-colon	Yes
6	Uncovered	100	24	Yes	Yes		Surgery	33	Lap-loop ileostomy, Palliative
7	Uncovered	100	24	Yes	Yes		Surgery	16	Cecum-Sigmoid Colon bypass
8	Uncovered	80	24	Yes	Yes		Surgery	64	Open and closure	Yes
9	Uncovered	80	24	Yes	Yes		Surgery	357	TG, BSO, T-colon segmental resection

SEMS self-expanding metal stent; BTS bridge to surgery; ISS interval from stent insertion to surgery; OP operation; ASOS another site obstruction after surgery; F female; M male; LAR lower anterior resection; TG total gastrectomy; BSO bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy

ISSN: 1471-230X